Neoma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 12:30 PM
Original message |
Physics and Philosophy by Werner Heisenberg |
BlooInBloo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. A lifetime ago. The best is to learn the math/physics (lin algebra/functional analysis/etc.)... |
|
And then see what he has to say. And then read people like van Fraassen and the like.
It's of limited utility to read popularizations ignorant of the technical details.
The entire history of the various mathematical formulations of QM is fascinating, though.
|
jobendorfer
(429 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 01:06 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I read it after taking a modern physics course. As I'm not the brightest bulb in the pack, sometimes I find myself getting lost in the equations.(*)
I was hoping to come away from Heisenberg's book with a little bit better understanding than what I came to it with, namely, the 500ft level understanding that the uncertainty principle makes whole classes of questions unanswerable, so you have to rethink physics in a way that simply doesn't ask those questions. But I was hoping for more.
The course I took briefly mentioned matrix mechanics, stated without evidence or proof that it was mathematically equivalent to Schrodinger's wave mechanics which we did cover in some detail, and obviously since Heisenberg formulated the uncertainty principle it must fall naturally out of his mathematics as well. But I'd like to see how!
(*) And now I'm taking all the math that I should have had the sense to take when I was 20, ( partial differential equations, complex analysis, etc ) and will have another go at QM in a year or two.
What did you think of it?
J.
|
Neoma
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Just started reading it actually. |
sfwriter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-15-09 03:28 PM
Response to Original message |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 04th 2025, 10:05 PM
Response to Original message |