Thats my opinion
(804 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 11:35 AM
Original message |
|
I've a pretty good grasp of the myriad ways Christians have been--and still are--among the worst enemies of the Jesus they claim to follow. In r/t the accusation has often been made that I only describe the good things people of faith have done The following two paragraphs are taken from a previous thread, and are only an example of what I have said in a variety of ways over these months.
"The worst enemies of Christian faith are Christians who are narrow, exclusivist, bigoted, war mongering, on and on and on. And there are plenty of them. Christian history if replete with prejudices, pogroms and support of tyranny. Somehow, however, there are a growing number of Christians who follow the one who was the Prince of Peace, defended all the left out, was ethically centuries ahead of his tradition and lured his followers beyond the commonalities of a cultures mired in bigotry.
As a pope in the middle-ages remarked, when asked how he could stay in the church with all its evil, 'It's like Noah's ark. The only way to tolerate the stink inside is to know about the storm outside.'”
|
cleanhippie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Doesn't this just boil down to the argument of who is a true christian and who is not? |
|
Edited on Thu Sep-01-11 11:51 AM by cleanhippie
Those that you claim are
"The worst enemies of Christian faith are Christians who are narrow, exclusivist, bigoted, war mongering, on and on and on."
can make the same argument that it is YOU who is not following the "Prince of Peace".
And they have the same book of writings to draw from to support their claims that you do.
:shrug:
|
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Then we need a new book if it is so easily twisted |
cleanhippie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
5. "We" need no such thing. Perhaps a book that can be so easily twisted should just be ignored? |
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
but there are some good things in it
|
cleanhippie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
I mean, sure, there are some good moral lessons (albeit not original ones), but they are, if not out-weighed, nullified by the terrible things in it.
|
dtexdem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
14. Basic clashes of world views, moral compasses, and concern for fellow humans. |
RevStPatrick
(564 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
3. They are not Christians... |
|
They are Leviticans. Or Old Testamentites.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:03 PM
Response to Original message |
4. Do YOU follow *every* teaching of Jesus? |
|
Are you absolutely sure that you have interpreted the bible correctly?
|
Angry Dragon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
that is why a lot of christians only take the parts they like the fundy right only take the mean stuff and stuff their minds with it
|
The Magistrate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:12 PM
Response to Original message |
8. As A Matter Of Curiousity, Sir...Which Pope Was That? |
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
10. I believe it was Pope HelpMeScoreARhetoricalPoint XXVI. n/t |
cleanhippie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #10 |
skepticscott
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-02-11 04:50 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
TexasProgresive
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 12:56 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
12. THe quote gets a lot of hits when searched but |
|
attribution is sketchy. Two citations that can't be proved are Reinhold Niebuhr and St. Augustine. It has been used a lot by preachers and others. Many of them just say, "Someone once said,"
A quip like that I would think came from someone like G.K. Chesterton or Oscar Wilde and not a pope.
|
The Magistrate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
15. Thank You for The Leg-Work, Sir: Citation Of An Actual Pope Was Not, Repeat Not, Expected In Reply |
|
The falsity of the thing is so obvious that its sole point of interest is wondering how someone could expect people to credit it as the statement of a medieval Pope, let alone himself believe it to be the statement of a medieval Pope --- particularly a man who actually is a professional clergyman.
|
Thats my opinion
(804 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
16. Tradition has it was Pope Gregory the Great (540--604) |
|
It has floated down through history and has been quoted all over. Did old Greg really he say it? If he didn't he should have.
|
The Magistrate
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-02-11 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. With All Due Respect, Sir, No Way In Hell Did the Man Ever Say That |
|
Though, speaking of Hell, here is a genuine quote from the gentleman in question:
"The bliss of the elect in heaven would not be perfect unless they were able to look across the abyss and enjoy the agonies of their brethren in eternal fire."
|
rrneck
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-01-11 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
|
because the occupants keep shitting in the stalls.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Oct 01st 2025, 04:36 AM
Response to Original message |