Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Phantom Procedure (PBA) *IS NOT* a Late Term Abortion.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:01 PM
Original message
The Phantom Procedure (PBA) *IS NOT* a Late Term Abortion.
The Phantom Procedure which has been called a 'PBA' by the Anti Abortion Propaganda Industry (AAPI)
IS NOT a Late Term Abortion (LTA).

The Phantom Procedure which has been called a 'PBA' by the Anti Abortion Propaganda Industry (AAPI)
IS NOT
a D&X Abortion (or ID&X).

The Phantom Procedure (PBA) is an undefined procedure and can be used to refer to almost any abortion performed after 12 weeks.

An easy explanation of the fraud is found in the discussion of bill S3, the so called "Partial Birth Abortion" Ban (which three courts have found unconstitutional) - on this page -.

Please read my - previous DU post -

As a further reference to the truth of these statements you could read - an excellent article - in Women's eNews.

Please do not permit this propaganda term to deceive you - and be especially vigilant when the Reich Wing Media, like the administration lapdogs they are - deliberately equivocate between "PBA" and "Late Term Abortion".

Since Bunnypants has stacked the court and wants them to look at the Phantom Procedure it is important to keep reminding people that the so called "PBA" is as phony as the Iraqi WMD - and has had about as much propaganda associated with it.

- Eileen`s always in process page -

Eileen
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 07:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Okay, I read your page and my head is spinning...
They want to ban a procedure that they won't name or after some part of a pregnancy that they won't specify?

You've got some good stuff on your page--I didn't know it was already illegal after viability in 40 states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Eileen Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 08:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes - you've got it right!
There is no reference to "late term" or in fact to any stage of pregnancy in the ban. Furthermore the description used is so broad that it could easily be claimed to describe any abortion although to use it to describe a vacuum aspiration abortion which is used in the first trimester would be a stretch (but that doesn't mean they wouldn't try).

While the State Supreme Courts that ruled this legislation unconstitutional found it so on the grounds that there is no "health of the woman" exception included in the legislation they could have just as easily, and as accurately, found it unconstitutional on the same grounds that Justice O'Connor found Steinberg v Carhart unconstitutional - which is:
Nebraska’s statute is unconstitutional on the alternative and independent ground that it imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to choose to terminate her pregnancy before viability. Nebraska’s ban covers not just the dilation and extraction (D&X) procedure, but also the dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedure, “the most commonly used method for performing pre viability second trimester abortions.” ... By proscribing the most commonly used method for pre viability second trimester abortions, the statute creates a “substantial obstacle to a woman seeking an abortion,” and therefore imposes an undue burden on a woman’s right to terminate her pregnancy prior to viability."


Thank you for your comments on the information I provide. I've been attempting to provide the needed information on this fraud since the term "PBA" was first coined - shortly after Dr. Haskell presented his paper to peers describing his use of a variation on a very old and formerly used abortion method and which those in the AAPI saw as a great source of propaganda by just applying some newspeak to vaugely and emotionally describe it.

The major question facing the SC justices, from the perspective of a woman seeking to end her pregnancy, is whether the justices will deal solely with the "health exception" constitutionality or will also deal with the "undue burden" question the legislation also raises.

Eileen
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. I remember the partial birth abortion bill from Clinton era and the
way it was described in the press at the time, including the stuff I heard from pro-choice people, made it seem pretty nasty and indefensible.

This business about nurses serving as abortion police does seem like it would make it less likely late procedures would be abused purely for convenience.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Warpy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Even in states where it's not illegal past viability
unless the fetus is deformed beyond salvageability, every attempt is made to deliver a live, premature fetus and keep it alive if the mother can't continue the pregnancy for any reason. Docs are all too aware that there may be a fundy nurse in the OR ready to alert one of the nutcase antiabortion lawyers out there if a live, viable fetus is delivered and allowed to die. Plus, if there is no compelling reason to allow a premature fetus to die, no doc wants to be a party to allowing it to die, it violates the oath.

Trust me, labor and delivery is where you'll find the largest proportion of fundy nurses, although not all of them are fundies, by any means.

This whole hullabaloo about abortions past the first trimester is disgusting, lots of ignorant people being whipped into a useless but dangerous frenzy by preachers looking for funding and trying to make names for themselves.

Those third trimester "abortions" of healthy fetuses are called premature childbirth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-21-06 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Women Who Lose It and Drown Their Kids in the Bathtub Are So Often Fundies
Were they all hoping that an angel of the lord will show up and stop them at the last minute?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 09:45 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. like Abraham? watch movie FRAILTY sometime--takes that idea to
its logical conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Nobody Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. This is common all over the animal kingdom
If a mother animal (yes that does include humans) is overcrowded, stressed out, can't cope for whatever reason, she will kill her young.

Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
HockeyMom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-24-06 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Runt of the litter
I can remember as a child visiting my uncle on a farm in Indiana where a mother cat ate the living runt of the litter. I was told as a little kid that this is done in the animal kingdom to insure the survival of the healthy siblings of the litter.

Gross, but maybe Mother Nature knows more than us? And these people worry about sending fertilized eggs down the toilet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
musical_soul Donating Member (398 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-22-06 04:49 PM
Response to Original message
7. You create wonderful and informative work.
Thanks for taking all the time and effort for this. People are so misinformed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 09th 2025, 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Choice Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC