William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-11 03:14 PM
Original message |
Quinn Top Moneymaker in NYC Mayoral Race |
|
 With nearly double the amount of her nearest challenger, New York City council speaker Christine Quinn has raised $1.32 million for her bid to become the Big Apple's first openly gay mayor. http://www.advocate.com/News/Daily_News/2011/07/15/Quinn_Top_Moneymaker_in_NYC_Mayoral_Race/
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-11 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
1. NO WAY I VOTE FOR HER. |
|
Woman gave away my hospital.
|
William769
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-11 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Hope you were able to find another one that you like.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-11 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
She sat still while North Shore opens a full-service hospital in an uptown area with one bed for every 85 people. But the Village/Chelsea/Soho? Over 350,000 people and all we get is a CLINIC? Quinn can go to Hell.
|
Smarmie Doofus
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-11 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
3. It appears it's ex-mentor Tom Duane's hand she's holding there. |
|
Edited on Fri Jul-15-11 04:54 PM by Smarmie Doofus
Tom brought her into politics when he ran ( lost first time; won a rematch a couple years later.) for city council as first openly gay Council candidate and member in the late 80's. Duane/Quinn rode a gay/progressive coalition that dominated that district politically for many years.
But it ( the hand) might just as well be Bloomberg's. She's a different person than the person she was back then. People don't send that kind of cash w/o expecting a return on their investment.
I'm not supporting her.
|
aquart
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-15-11 05:53 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
5. I used to adore both Duanes, Tom and John. |
|
But Tom also had a hand in the Saint Vincent's debacle.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Jul 29th 2025, 11:06 PM
Response to Original message |