HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-10 02:32 PM
Original message |
Opinion collides with science at Fox News |
|
Edited on Tue Oct-05-10 02:38 PM by HuckleB
http://autism-news-beat.com/archives/1243#comments"On September 25, America’s favorite daytime think tank, Fox and Friends, alleged that vaccines cause autism, and that the US government is covering it up. And because this is Fox News, the story comes packaged in outrage: the US Federal Court of Claims is asking parents for a medical expert’s opinion of how the injury may have occurred. Apparently, it’s not enough to merely allege injury in court – one must offer a rational explanation for how it could have happened.
“The letter basically asked us to provide them with a theory of why we believe the vaccines caused the autism, and to provide them with a medical expert’s opinion, which is the difficult part,” explained Dana Hall, who appears to be speaking for all 5,000 petitioners in the Autism Omnibus Proceedings, to outraged Fox Friend Alisyn Camerota. “We have the theories. We are not able to find medical experts who are willing to come forth and risk losing their medical license and to help our children.” Furthermore, said Hall, the evidence exists to link vaccines to autism – “it’s just a matter of looking in the right places.” Because Hall took her case to Fox News, there was no attempt to follow up with fair and balanced questions, such as “Why would a medical expert face professional sanctions for giving an evidence-based opinion?”, or “Why didn’t the petitioners’ attorneys and medical experts look in the right places for the evidence that vaccines cause autism?”
...
If Camerota had done her homework, she would have known that “vaccine court” was created during the Reagan Administration because the “nearly impossible legal hoops” that parents faced in vaccine injury cases were clogging up courts and forcing manufacturers out of the business. The “not normal” rules that Holland excoriates work in favor of parents. Simply put, if vaccine A is known to cause side effect B within X days following vaccination (called a table injury), and the facts of a case line up with the table injury, the case is usually settled. It’s a “more likely than not” standard of evidence that is nowhere near what plaintiffs face in civil court. In addition, plaintiff’s legal costs are covered win or lose, and decisions are reached much faster than would occur in civil court.
In short, few if any of the 5,000 claims would have stood a chance in civil court, where parents pay huge legal bills, and judges are bound by far tougher rules of evidence.
..."-------------------------------------------------------- I had no idea that Fox went down this road. I should have known, since science is not exactly a priority for Fox, and, well, they're obviously not too focused on honest journalism, and well, I'm being far too kind to Fox, aren't I? :(
|
Odin2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-10 10:26 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Another reason that Fux Snooze is evil. |
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-05-10 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
evirus
(782 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 06:12 AM
Response to Original message |
3. On the bright side Fox and Bill Maher finally have something to agree on |
|
even though both end up being scientifically illiterate douche bags on the subject.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 08:07 AM
Response to Original message |
|
What is all that horseshit about cialis at the top there anyway?
|
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Thanks for the baseless ad hominem attack followed by a useless red herring. |
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 08:25 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. You didn't answer the question. |
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
9. Your "question" is nothing but a red herring. |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-08-10 11:21 AM by HuckleB
BTW, we get to see Republican ads at DU. And... Well, and nothing.
|
trotsky
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 08:31 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. Fox is indeed a nasty site. |
|
Glad I'm not on their side in the vaccination wars.
|
bemildred
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 08:33 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I meant the autism news place, there is bad stuff there. |
|
I would worry about visiting there if I was running Windows with a generic setup. Not that I want to defend Fox.
|
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. It's a fine site, with a great list of links. |
|
Edited on Fri Oct-08-10 11:25 AM by HuckleB
It's interesting that you're trying to scare people from it.
|
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Oct-08-10 11:06 AM
Response to Reply #7 |
HuckleB
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Oct-12-10 01:50 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Fox & Friends Did It Again, With The Help Of Dr. Bob Sears, aka BS. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Jul 30th 2025, 12:06 AM
Response to Original message |