zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-22-05 10:19 AM
Original message |
Info needed as backup to possible Christian Science Monitor LTTE |
|
I wrote a letter (e-mail) to the Christian Science Monitor in which I questioned why nobody in the media seems to be quoting Orrin Hatch's other "Ginsburg precedent" - that he suggested to Bill Clinton that Ruth Bader Ginsburg be the nominee.
I also included that Orrin Hatch did question her on her past during the confirmation hearings.
Now, I did find a reference for use if they question my assertion that Hatch suggested Ginsburg: Hatch's own AUTOBIOGRAPHY - "Square Peg: Confessions of a Citizen Senator", where he stated that Clinton nominated her at his (Hatch's) suggestion.
HOWEVER, I am having troubles getting the transcript of the nomination hearings. I did have some inkling of the questioning by Hatch as seen on THOMAS - the Congressional Record online.
Now, there's an interesting thing that I found in my search for the transcript.
I did a google search for "Ginsburg confirmation hearing transcript". Found a large number of RightWing sites that, almost unanimously verbatim, quoted the same explanation of a four-paragraph passage from the transcripts. BUT I DID NOT FIND A LINK TO THE TRANSCRIPTS. Not wanting to give the sites any extra hits, I selected a few to see if I could find a link. Do you know, none of them had a link? And you would expect that Google would have a link to it.
Is there any link to the transcripts to her confirmation?
If they decide to use my letter, and they decide to confirm my info, I would like to have the transcript available to show where he questioned her (on the Death Penalty and her time in the ACLU).
|
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-22-05 10:33 AM
Response to Original message |
1. media matters has a small excerpt |
zbdent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Jul-22-05 10:36 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Thanks. I will hold on to that |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Oct 06th 2025, 10:23 PM
Response to Original message |