Strong Atheist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 10:59 AM
Original message |
Apparently, some people think it is just fine to cane a woman for DRINKING BEER, as long as the ones |
stray cat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 11:01 AM
Response to Original message |
1. Do people think its fine - or just think we can't invade a country to change their laws? |
Strong Atheist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Oh, some there are arguing that it is good because there are problems in the |
|
west too, you know, therefore caning women for drinking beer is ok.
|
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-27-09 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Nobody said it was "good" or said anything positive about it at all. They didn't say "it's good ... because we as a nation do worse." They said "it's bad, but we're not in a position to point fingers because we as a nation do worse."
If anyone anywhere in that thread said anything positive about caning anyone, it must have been in an invisible font.
|
Strong Atheist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-28-09 08:35 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. "but we're not in a position to point fingers" Same response: |
noamnety
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Aug-28-09 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. I'm just commenting on your misrepresentation of facts here. |
|
Fact: nobody said it was good, nobody endorsed it as policy.
|
Strong Atheist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Aug-29-09 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. Yeah, they are merely defending the heck out of it. A distinction without a |
|
Edited on Sat Aug-29-09 01:26 PM by Strong Atheist
difference, imo, but whatever floats yer boat.
:eyes:
eoc.
|
ZombieHorde
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Aug-26-09 11:09 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
3. Your post is the first one I have noticed on this subject which has mentioned invasion. nt |
One_Life_To_Give
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-27-09 11:03 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Looks more like just one (two if you count the one supposedly being banned). With one other poster pointing out that technically anyway the law is gender neutral. Not exactly an endorsement of Sharia and the poor treatment of women in many countries where it is practiced.
|
Strong Atheist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-27-09 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
|
careful, so I would not get in trouble/post deleted...
|
Violet_Crumble
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Sep-29-09 12:35 AM
Response to Original message |
10. No-one in that thread said anything at all like that... |
|
And the person in the thread that warned you how easily OPs like yrs can turn into Muslim bashing fests was spot on, though usually I'm figuring there's not going to be any rational discussion in anything once those *religion of peace* words are spat out...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 04th 2025, 10:59 PM
Response to Original message |