| yewberry  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Tue Jul-05-05 07:47 PM Original message
 | 
  
    | Okay, say I was still running, oh I don't know, 9.2 | 
  
    |  | 
         Edited on Tue Jul-05-05 07:48 PM by tofunut on my g3.  Yes, imagine it's a blue and white g3 running 9.2.2...I'm properly embarassed. :blush: (I've just never felt the need to update.)
 I have, in front of me, OS X. It's 10.1 and I'm thinking about using it! (Disclaimer: I tried to install panther the other day, and that's a definite no go.)
 
 What should I know about OS X before I jump in? Are there dangers lurking around every corner?
 
 Oh, and you should also imagine that I'm a complete doofus about computers and respond as such.
 
 Thank you!
 
 edit: since when is there a "v" in definite?
 | 
  
    | architect359  (544 posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Wed Jul-06-05 12:24 AM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 1. Why wouldn't Panther run on your B+W G3? | 
  
    |  | Edited on Wed Jul-06-05 12:28 AM by architect359 I was under the impression that it was covered?  I've heard that it runs very slow but it still runs.  Anyway, I digress.  I've gone the route from 7.5.5 to 10.1 to currently 10.3.9.  I don't believe that there are dangers - unless you intentionly do something.  For instance, the terminal app = don't touch unless you know what's what i.e., wrong input on the command line and you could kill your machine.  I think that's the most dangerous tool to play with.  Other than that, its not a steep learning curve to get familiar with the OS.  You should try to upgrade as far away from 10.1 as you can - in my opinion, the 10.1 series was basically the beta stage.  Try 10.2 at the least.  Good luck and hope you enjoy the upgrade.  :-) 
 <edit> ps:  no need to be embaressed.  I was on my ol' '030 Apple IIci while it seemed that everyone was switching over to the PowerPC platform.
 | 
  
    | yewberry  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Wed Jul-06-05 01:13 AM Response to Reply #1
 | 
  
    |  | but there was no joy in mudville with panther. 
 I have all of the system requirements listed, but it simply would not recognize the software disk...just plain wouldn't respond. (When I tried to install, I got a message saying that I needed to restart.  When I tried to boot up from the panther disk, it wouldn't even start up. No chime, just...nothing.  Huh.)  I got a third-hand explanation that the panther disk couldn't be read by the g3, but it'd be fine if I used my CD burner to install.  Wha??
 
 So, now I guess I will set up the OS X tomorrow. I think that I was half-remembering stories about OS X being buggy when it first came out and looking for reassurance.
 
 Thanks so much for your input!
 
 (PS--I had a IIci, too...used it all the way up 'til the advent of my blueberry imac!!)
 | 
  
    | architect359  (544 posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Wed Jul-06-05 09:29 AM Response to Reply #2
 | 
  
    |  | Now that Zorro mentioned it in the post below - I do recall that there had been a stink about the G3 machines, or at least the earliest versions.
 I clung onto that IIci until the DVSE iMac came out.  In fact, I have 10.3.9 running on that machine w/o a problem (so far).  I wonder about Tiger - that may be too much for my iMac though.  Anyway, as I mentioned before try 10.2 or if not, get as high up in the 10.1 series.  If you're stuck with 10.1, I wonder if it's just better to get a more current machine or just stay with Classic?  I mean, there's the Mac mini that's pretty affordable, or maybe trade in your B+W at a place like PowerMax.  I understand that they'll take your old machine and give some credit back for the new one (which may not be much for a B+W at this stage).  They also have refurbs and second hand machines.  Oh, Smalldog Electronics is another resource for refurbs too.
 
 Anyway, hope this helps and good luck.
 | 
  
    | Zorro  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Wed Jul-06-05 09:10 AM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 3. Some early iMacs aren't OS X compatible | 
  
    |  | I remember Apple settled a class-action lawsuit about this a couple of years ago. 
 You might want to do some Googling to research this issue before you make the plunge.
 | 
  
    | Poiuyt  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Wed Jul-06-05 11:18 PM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 5. I installed Tiger (10.4) on a B&W Powermac | 
  
    |  | Could the problem be that the Panther install disks are on DVD and you have a CD drive in the B&W? | 
  
    | yewberry  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Thu Jul-07-05 04:47 PM Response to Reply #5
 | 
  
    |  | Yup, that's the third-hand answer I got.
 Did you install Tiger with an external device?
 | 
  
    | Poiuyt  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Thu Jul-07-05 07:27 PM Response to Reply #7
 | 
  
    |  | I used another computer hooked up with firewire target disk mode | 
  
    | yellowdawgdem  (972 posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Thu Jul-07-05 02:11 AM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 6. I am pretty much in the same situation | 
  
    |  | I am running 9.2 on a g4, and don't really see a reason to upgrade to osx.  I mean, I see lots of reasons, but they are mostly things like having more choices for a browser, or being able to use stuff that is current.  otoh, I don't really like the interface for osx, and am sticking with what I like.  Also, it seems like the newest versions of osx , such as tiger, would overpower the slower macs.   | 
  
    | TeeYiYi  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 12:16 PM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 9. What about Jaguar 10.2.8  . . . | 
  
    |  | Edited on Mon Jul-18-05 01:04 PM by TeeYiYi You can install Jaguar onto a G3. That's the highest OS that will work with a G3. You're going to have to step up to a newer machine to move to Tiger (or Panther). I still use Jaguar on my G4 and it works great. I have my drives partitioned and I still have 9.2.2 as a startup on one partition. Jaguar is definitely better than 10.1. I'll be moving to Tiger soon though. FYI, I never boot in 9 anymore.
 TYY
 
 On Edit: I've been looking around on the internets and from what I can tell, you should be able to install Tiger on a G3. The system requirements for Tiger on Apple.com include the G3. I also read some individual success stories on different forums. So, nevermind about my comment re: "the highest OS what will work". That may have been true with Panther, but Tiger is a different animal. :D
 | 
  
    | TeeYiYi  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 12:22 PM Response to Reply #9
 | 
  
    |  | . . . to some good advice if you decide to upgrade your G3 to OSX.http://resale.headgap.com/osxnotes.html TYY | 
  
    | rocktivity  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Mon Jul-18-05 10:12 PM Response to Reply #10
 | 
  
    | 11. And here's where you can buy Jaguar for only $17 if you have a DVD drive | 
  
    |  | from Other World Computing . If you don't have a DVD drive, they sell http://eshop.macsales.com/shop/optical-drives ">those, too.  :headbang:rocknation | 
  
    | emulatorloo  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Wed Aug-03-05 07:47 AM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 12. Don't go less than 10.3 -- cheap 10.3 here: | 
  
    |  | Edited on Wed Aug-03-05 07:48 AM by emulatorloo | 
  
    | politicat  (1000+ posts)
      Send PM | 
      Profile | 
      Ignore | Thu Aug-04-05 01:43 PM Response to Original message
 | 
  
    | 13. Go HERE: www.lowendmacs.com and read the articles on B&W OSX | 
  
    |  | http://www.lowendmac.com/ppc/g3c.shtml and this article is really important: http://www.lowendmac.com/lab/05/0301.html Don't feel bad - lots of people still run OS9... and 8, and 7.  Run what works best for your machine.  | 
  
    | DU 
AdBot (1000+ posts)         | Fri Oct 31st 2025, 01:19 AM Response to Original message
 |