Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 06:38 PM
Original message |
Now that Hillary and Obama split 4 delegates in Guam today...... |
|
....and all that excitement in GDP, John Edwards' 39 delegates are looking pretty good now :rofl:
Sorry, couldn't help it. :grouphug:
|
waiting for hope
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Catch - you are one of my favs - |
Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
The Guam threads in GDP did make me chuckle :hug: back 'atcha !
|
Two Americas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:20 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Every time you mention Edwards campaign I get pissed off all over again.
|
Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
wink, wink.
There's got to be some fun left in politics :hi:
|
balantz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:26 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Does J.E. have 39 pledged delegates? |
|
I read he has 19 on another thread.
|
Catchawave
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. My bad....depends on the math these days.... |
|
31 including Michigan and Florida, according to MyDD.
I thought it was more, some may have flipped to another candidate?
He's still more powerful than Guam with 19 :D
|
balantz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat May-03-08 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
7. So there are 31 if Florida and Michigan are to be included? |
|
How many if they aren't?
I know I could look this stuff up, I'm being lazy I guess.
|
balantz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-04-08 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
8. Looking around I think I found the correct numbers, correct me if I'm wrong here. |
|
J.E. has 26 pledged delegates, Florida and Michigan top him off at 31. Is this correct?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Sep 18th 2025, 11:57 PM
Response to Original message |