DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 02:31 PM
Original message |
| We need a Progressive version of the NFIB |
|
these guys speak as if they represent all small businesses. They don't and we need to do something to combat them.
|
mongo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 03:40 PM
Response to Original message |
|
We will not be renewing our membership. They mailed us numerous pieces of junk supporting Bush.
Apparently, they only support the biggest of "small business"
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jan-24-05 05:05 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. they view business with 500 employees as small |
|
We need to start a group that's progressive.
|
F.Gordon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-02-05 11:41 AM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Why don't you start one? |
|
I've considered doing it as part of my semi-retirement program. The GOP has stolen the Small Business issue from the Democrats, and no one seems willing to step up and work at getting it back.
|
DaveinMD
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-08-05 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I'm already involved with several projects and we just had a baby. But I have started talking to some folks about it.
|
F.Gordon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-11-05 10:13 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
| 5. Please keep me informed |
|
..and congrats on the new family member!!!
I'd be a very willing advocate for something like this. Either active or passive. Would also have some 'venture' capital. Not a lot, but some.
Was planning on fielding a national inquiry on this idea myself over the summer. Try to get feedback at the local level all over the country....
|
Finder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun May-15-05 01:13 PM
Response to Original message |
Jane Austin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-14-05 12:52 PM
Response to Original message |
| 7. I'd be very interested in a group like this. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Oct 24th 2025, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message |