Endangered Specie
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-04 01:12 PM
Original message |
| Deleted Star Trek Nemesis lines... |
|
Edited on Mon Nov-29-04 01:26 PM by Endangered Specie
|
| Gothic Sponge
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-04 03:18 PM
Response to Original message |
|
:D
Nemesis was such a let down. IMO it was worst than Star Trek 5.....and 5 was BAD!
|
| coloradodem2005
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-04 04:50 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. It wasn't worse than 5. |
|
But I think there was complacency in the writing etc. of the movie because they thought that since it was even numbered, it would be good and they were arrogant to release it against Lord of the Rings. Many people didn't even know that there was a Star Trek movie out that year. It was also about a month or two before my life started getting bad, so I have negative associations with that movie.
|
| Placebo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-04 05:00 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Those are hillarious.
UGH, but even more bad news? The new Star Trek movie is supposed to be set in the PAST.
'PAST' as in, set sometime between the current 'Enterprise' TV show and TOS Movies.
Why do they keep going backwards? I miss when Star Trek used to be all about going forwards. *sigh*
|
| XanaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Nov-29-04 09:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. God, that movie sucked |
|
My BF and I just walked out of the theatre in shock...
And Spiner helped write it?
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Thu Oct 23rd 2025, 03:01 PM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
