whometense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 02:30 PM
Original message |
| OMG - if you can handle it, Jon Stewart |
|
Edited on Tue Jan-19-10 02:32 PM by whometense
on the mess in Mass. Brilliant. Hilarious - but OUCH. http://tpmlivewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/2010/01/stewart-tears-apart-the-dems-on-ma-sen-and-health-care.php?ref=fpbEdited to add - of COURSE you can handle it - but it depends on whether you're ready to laugh at the situation or not. I laughed out loud several times, almost in spite of myself.
|
Luftmensch067
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 02:38 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I don't think I'm ready for more ouch yet!
|
wisteria
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:00 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. I may not be ready for his for several days. n/t |
Blaukraut
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
This was amazingly spot on! Stewart pointed out the painfully obvious at the end. Without Coakley they'll have an 18 vote majority, instead of a 19 - more than Dubya ever had, and more than the repubs has since 1923!
:rofl:
Oh my, that made my day. No matter what happens tonight, we'll get through it, and won't die, either.
:grouphug:
|
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:27 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 6. I've wanted someone to say that |
|
The fact is that last year, as Kerry spoke hopefully of Democratic President and a bigger majority, I don't think he ever gave a number higher than 57. The fact is that we still would have a huge majority.
However, I hope the huge turn out means that MA doesn't want the centerfold. (It STILL surprises me that doesn't bother the family value people - could you imagine in 2004, the complete chaos and concern there would have been had our VP candidate been found to have been a centerfold. There would have been talk of the need to throw him off the ticket.
|
whometense
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
|
as others have before me, what it would have meant to Martha Coakley's chances of being elected to any public office if she'd ever been featured as a centerfold.
I don't care about the picture; I do very much care about the double standard.
|
karynnj
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 06:26 PM
Response to Reply #7 |
|
It would have prevented her from even running for DA. It likely might have been hard even to keep a prosecutor's job. You are right that there is a huge double standard - we aren't far from the Madonna/Whore stereotyping of the 1950s as far as women politicians go. (Note Madonna as in the Virgin Mary)
There also seems a Republican/Democrat double standard. The fact that Vitter and Ensign are apparently (per a recent DK overview) endangered is mind boggling. Vitter broke the law as much as Spitzer did and Ensign's had so many levels of problems that it makes Clinton look good. ( Doubling her pay for work in his two PACs and the RNC giving her son a "job" and then paying the husband off are all really wrong - in addition to the idea that she worked for him - as did her husband.) Yet he is supposedly the most popular politician in Nevada. It is not the sex that was the big problem - other than to their wives - but both broke the law.
|
MBS
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:13 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. It was indeed painful to listen to him, but he nailed it. |
|
Yup, we'll survive, one way or the other.
|
Mass
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 03:17 PM
Response to Original message |
TayTay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-19-10 08:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 9. Dead on and painfully funny |
|
Sigh!
Some days you get the bear, some days the bear gets you.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 25th 2025, 02:23 PM
Response to Original message |