XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-16-06 05:04 PM
Original message |
| Poll question: What do you think is the best field guide for beginning birders? |
|
I have a friend who is starting to get into birding, and I want to get him a field guide as a present for our trip to Arizona.
So which guide do you think is best for a beginner?
|
TaleWgnDg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sun Jul-16-06 10:56 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Without question. Without reservation. I highly recommend |
|
. Without question. Without reservation. I highly recommend Peterson's. The organization, easy access, distinctive characteristics, range maps, etc., make Peterson's the unqualified best in bird field guides, particularly for beginners.  http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/peterson/petersonhome.cfm http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/peterson/bird.cfm http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/peterson/bird2.cfm
 Description: Peterson First Guides are the first books the beginning naturalist needs. Condensed versions of the famous Peterson Field Guides, the First Guides focus on the animals, plants, and other natural things you are most likely to see. They make it fun to get into the field and easy to progress to the full-fledged Peterson Guides. http://www.houghtonmifflinbooks.com/catalog/titledetail.cfm?titleNumber=681338 .
|
semillama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-17-06 12:04 PM
Response to Original message |
|
I learned on Peterson, but since having used sibley's as my main guide, I have to go with it for beginners as well as experienced birders.
My reasons:
Range maps on same page as bird description Clarity of illustrations Layout (Peterson's I feel has too much going on with each page - Sibley's puts each bird by itself with the text for the bird)
I noted that for myself, when I switched from Peterson to Sibley, my identification rate went up quite a bit.
The NG guide is a real good one to have to throw in a suitcase when you travel, so you always have a guide that will be relevant in NA no matter where you are.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Jul-17-06 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. You don't think something like Kaufman |
|
with Sibley or Natty Geo as a backup?
|
blindpig
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jul-18-06 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
|
I use the Audubon Master Guide for backup when doing serious birding. Peterson's was my bible for 30 years but Sibley's is the stuff today.
|
semillama
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jul-19-06 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 5. Kaufman has the same problem as Peterson |
|
in that there's too much going on with the design - I picked it up in the store and immediately knew I would never use it (plus the background colors are hideous). The design of the Sibley book is the key element - in my opinion it's the most user friendly.
|
OnionPatch
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Aug-10-06 01:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. I like the National Geographic |
|
The pictures are great and one of the things I like is that they have a pretty large paragraph for each bird. Lots of info.
|
Jamastiene
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Sep-02-06 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. I have the Field Guide to the Birds of North America |
|
by National Geographic Society, second edition, ISBN 0-87044-692-4. It includes pictures of juvenile birds and pictures of male and female adults. It has maps that tell the range of each bird they list whether it be the winter range or breeding range. It also includes a good bit of information about each bird listed. I highly recommend this one or at least some edition of it. I have tried many field guides and this one is the only one that helped me identify for certain a red cockaded woodpecker years ago at my old homeplace. Many of the other did not include endangered species, other than a small note about them. This one has lots of different types of birds from predatory birds to songbirds and almost everything in between. Others I have tried only paled in comparison.
|
carpetbagger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 12:21 AM
Response to Original message |
|
It may not be the best guide overall, but a beginning guide needs to have range maps on the same page (unlike Peterson), pointers to field marks rather than text explanations (unlike NG), portability (unlike even hemi-Sibley).
I have the same built-in bias against photograph-based guides (the older generations were useless for differentiating similar spp), but the Kaufman photos hold nearly up to Sibley's drawings in quality, better than Peterson, not as good as NG.
I taught myself Spanish bird names and terms with the Spanish-language version of the book (Guia de campo a las aves de Norteamerica).
For Texans, the best book to get someone to get them interested in birds is actually Tveten's "Birds of Texas". Not a field guide, but it's got great photography and descriptions that tell you what the bird is actually like.
|
XemaSab
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 08:04 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
| 9. Kenn's a helluva nice guy |
|
I was really impressed that he put out a Spanish-language guide.
Have you read Kingbird Highway?
I have a signed copy. :D
|
carpetbagger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Sep-06-06 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
|
"A box of Little Friskies, stuffed in my backpack, could keep me going for days."
He came to Mitchell Lake (where I volunteer) a few months ago.
While the best bird guide in NA is debatable, the best butterfly guide isn't. His is unbelievably above everyone else's. I'm hoping he'll have some time left in his career to tackle a few more areas, since I can think of several invertebrate groups that are overdue for good, easy field guides.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 25th 2025, 02:43 PM
Response to Original message |