YewNork
(449 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 09:51 AM
Original message |
So, what do Lieberman's CT constituents think of the position he's taking? |
|
Do the voters in CT who elected him want a public option or Medicare extended to persons aged 55 and over?
Has anyone asked them their opinion. They're the ones who will or will not reelect him.
|
calico1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 09:55 AM
Response to Original message |
1. I voted for Lamont but I do know there is a lot of |
|
Edited on Fri Dec-18-09 10:10 AM by calico1
buyer's remorse among the Democrats and Independents who voted for Lieberman in'06.
|
AndyA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 09:56 AM
Response to Original message |
2. Ned Lamont said on TV a couple of days ago that people in Connecticut |
|
just want Congress to vote. Up or down, they want it voted on.
So I would say they're not too happy with Joe right now, since he's helping to block the vote to some degree.
I can't even begin to say how many times I've wished Lamont had won, we'd be so much better off today with him in Congress instead of asshole Lieberman.
|
Kahuna
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 10:43 AM
Response to Original message |
3. holy joe does not care what his constituents think. He only cares what |
|
joe thinks. Too bad people who voted for him were too ignorant to realize that.
|
90-percent
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Dec-18-09 11:32 AM
Response to Original message |
|
and worked for Lamont and against Joe back when Joe lost the Dem nomination.
Just goes to show you Connecticut can be just as stupid as the reddest of red states at times.
-90% Jimmy
|
Virgil Cain
(18 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-26-10 09:08 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Was there during the Lamont race. People were very excited about him, but when push came to shove, they still went with ol' Joe. The devil you know I guess...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Oct 04th 2025, 05:31 AM
Response to Original message |