NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 06:22 PM
Original message |
Women's Magazines - I Just Can't Read Them |
|
And I haven't tried for over 15 years.
It seems like every article I ever read in a magazine that was marketed to women (Cosmo, Redbook, LHJ, Playgirl) gave its subject the most shallow of treatments.
So, how's the water these days? Do they still think we're ditzes?
|
Beaverhausen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 06:41 PM
Response to Original message |
1. More Magazine is geared toward women over 40 |
|
They deal with a lot of different subjects.
|
Chovexani
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 06:48 PM
Response to Original message |
|
The few times I flip through them at the supermarket I can literally feel my brain cells dying...
|
Pithlet
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 07:15 PM
Response to Original message |
|
It seems like most women's magazines are either vapid crap, or are geared towards homemaking. Cosmo is nothing but a grown up version of YM and Girltalk.
|
Kat45
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 08:08 PM
Response to Original message |
4. I've never read women's magazines, but I read Allure sometimes. |
|
I read it to learn makeup tips. I don't wear a lot of makeup, but I'd like to wear more than I do and I don't know a whole lot about putting it on. :shrug:
|
Longhorn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 08:13 PM
Response to Original message |
5. I was a Redbook subscriber for years |
|
but got tired of all the articles being geared toward pleasing my man in bed! :D
|
politicat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 09:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
My grandmother and mother are absolute addicts though. They're always sending clippings (and more recently, scans of clippings, now that they have scanners) on the stupidest of subject matter.
I don't mind Ms. but their subscription staff could use some assistance. They've lost two of my 4 subscriptions over the last 4 years.
|
XanaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Mar-29-05 11:52 PM
Response to Original message |
7. "Jane" is good, slightly subversive |
|
in a mainstream type way. I am afraid it may go out of business, though, just they just lowered the price.
Figures.
While crap like Marie Claire stays around.
|
DemBones DemBones
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-30-05 03:35 AM
Response to Original message |
8. I don't know how long it's been since I read a women's magazine. |
|
Probably back when I cancelled my subscription to Ms. in 1978, after they creatively edited my LTE before printing it. If anyone's interested I'll tell you the story.
|
Longhorn
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-30-05 07:36 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
XanaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-31-05 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
11. I would like to hear that! |
JI7
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Mar-30-05 01:07 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Allure Magazine is pretty good |
|
it focuses on fashion and beauty mostly and avoids a lot of the "how to please your man" type stuff found in Cosmo and many others.
|
Tracer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-31-05 03:19 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Another NO to women's mags... |
|
... and a BIG NO to the Lifetime channel ...
... and another BIG NO to women authors (at least, most of them).
|
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-31-05 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Are you talking lit or bodice rippers?
I've had a guilty pleasure for Georgette Heyer stuff since I was a teen. Can't be helped.
|
XanaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-01-05 12:15 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
15. Did she write a book titled "Ribbons In Her Hair"? |
NashVegas
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-01-05 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Not Familiar With the Title |
|
Heyer was kind of a poor woman's Jane Austen. Her stories were set in the same time period, but less cerebral. Pure fluff, but fun fluff.
|
XanaDUer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-01-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
Lifetime TV? You mean "Deathtime"? I gotta say, sometimes I just love their cheesy movies...
|
lukasahero
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Apr-01-05 08:30 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
I haven't read the kind of "women authors" I think you are refering to since high school (Danielle Steel kind of crap) but I have several women authors that I adore: Barbara Kingsolver, Linda Hogan, Amy Tan, Toni Morrison, Arundhati Roy, Cynthia Moss, Anna Quindlen...
And a big no on the "women's magazine" crap. I hope that if enough people don't buy into the "myth" by not buying the magazines then they'll stop promoting it.
|
politicat
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 12:06 AM
Response to Reply #12 |
18. Lots of writers who happen to be women on my shelves... |
|
But no target marketing writers. I don't do romances in general, though I don't mind romantic (or Romantic) plotlines.
Looking at the Trade paper bookshelf (what, you don't arrange your books by size?) I see: Rita Mae Brown Susannah Clarke (just laying on top) Laurie R. King, Judith Tarr, Marion Meade, Donna Woolfolk Cross, Margaret Rosenthal, Robin McKinley, Joanne Harris, Erin Hart, Maeve Binchy....
However, the last romance purchased in this house was bought because the author's a friend and colleague, and promptly sent to my mother (who does read them) when I finished so I could tell L. that I'd read her book.
|
BamaGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #18 |
19. "what, you don't arrange your books by size?" |
|
Lol What!? You mean everyone doesn't do this!? Hell, mine are even sub-divided by subject/genre lol.
|
BamaGirl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-02-05 09:14 PM
Response to Original message |
20. Not worth the time or money imo |
|
I do pick up a couple of fitness mags here and there, and science type mags. I can't stand Lifetime either. I call it the victimized women channel. :eyes: I will admit to the occassional romance novel though lol.
|
scarlet_owl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Apr-14-05 04:19 PM
Response to Original message |
21. I can't read them either. I guess I'm not that kind of woman. |
|
I rarely wear makeup, I don't give a good gosh darn about clothes or hairstyles, I HATE to cook, and I don't get my jollies from reading inspirational stories of personal triumph. The thing that really makes me laugh about womens' magazines are the covers. On one side it will say something like "Lose 10 pounds in 10 days" and on the other it will say "best cupcake recipes EVER!".
|
Hello_Kitty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Apr-16-05 01:13 AM
Response to Original message |
|
They have good book and movie reviews and offer some interesting articles about a range of political and social topics. But you still have to wade through tons of ads and silly beauty advice to get them. They do tend to treat their readers with a modicum of respect, though.
|
shimmergal
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Jul-02-05 08:49 AM
Response to Original message |
23. I like looking at them (some of them) |
|
for recipes. "Supermarket" magazines seem to be the best here. Also their fashion articles (when they have them) carry clothes I might actually buy (style & pricewise.) I'm talking about Woman's Day and Family Circle here, NOT the tabloids.
Other women's magazines I may occasionally scan, but they've gone _way_ overboard on the celebrity angle. That's a real turnoff to me.
The sex or how/to/keep/a/man advice is just fluff, IMO.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Oct 22nd 2025, 09:13 PM
Response to Original message |