jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 03:59 PM
Original message |
|
That story in the NYT about McCain....does anybody else think the timing was weird? I mean, they could have posted that story anytime over the last year, but they didn't.
They posted it the day after Obama got his 10th straight win. McCain's little indiscretion became the big story of the day, and moved Mr. Obama down in the news.
I don't know if it was coincidence or not - but I'd like to think that is was not.
:tinfoilhat:
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 04:18 PM
Response to Original message |
1. The way I understand it... |
|
The NYT was waiting for a source to go on the record about the sex part, and another news outlet (NRO?) forced them to publish early.
As for your theory...
Obama who?
|
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
|
Oh come on - don't ruin my fantasy :P
I was hoping the NYT was trying to help Hillary.
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
3. Hey, did you catch that thread on Obama and School vouchers? |
|
I think I saw some Obama bubbles bursting before my very eyes.
|
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. No - I'm trying to stay away from gd-p. |
|
Still have a few black and blue marks from the last time I went out there.
But I'll look for it.
|
displacedtexan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
murbley40
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #2 |
|
Did you know that the New York times endorsed McCain?
|
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 05:14 PM
Response to Reply #5 |
|
I thought about that, but I still grabbed my tin foil hat anyway :)
The good thing for Hillary is that it gave the msm something else to talk about other than the audacity of hype.
|
katty
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message |
8. not surprising-nothing is coincidence w/the presstitutes |
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-08 08:37 PM
Response to Original message |
9. sounds like they were sitting on it tell after the big primaries. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Sat Sep 20th 2025, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message |