feminazi
(911 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 11:15 AM
Original message |
so Richardardson is going to endorse The Precious One? |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 11:17 AM by feminazi
I guess experience isn't really as important to him as he said it was. http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080321/ap_on_el_pr/obama_richardsonedited to add link
|
Andromeda
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 11:30 AM
Response to Original message |
1. What a disappointment. |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 11:31 AM by Andromeda
And I thought he had integrity. I guess he has the right to endorse anybody he wants to but I just want to :spank: him.
|
Dinger
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
2. I Am Supporting Hillary Clinton, But Let's Not |
|
Edited on Fri Mar-21-08 12:00 PM by Dinger
call Obama anything other than who he is, Obama. To me, Richardson's endorsement is good for Obama, but not that much of a detriment to Clinton. And yes, Richardson is a disappointment, a major one.
|
DemCam
(911 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Ah, yes...The Big Shill, with palm out, |
|
Slithers in his endorsement by email this morning...Good Friday.
I'm from New Mexico and am thankful I didn't support him in his bid for President...as a good New Mexican Democrat.A done
He is now a lame duck with no place to go. Hillary couldn't promise him what he wants...probably VP...because she doesn't need the demographic that he brings. Obama does need an inroad into the Hispanic community as well as Puerto Rico.
I fear that our party's leadership has colluded to back Obama at all cost, to get Hillary out of the race after Pennsylvania no matter what happens there, so they can kick the Clintons to the curb and take over the Party. By blocking MI and FL it looks for all the world like, as they love to say... Hillary can't beat the math.
A done deal? not quite yet. More work, more money to Hillary.
|
judaspriestess
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. I'm disappointed in his decision |
|
but I suspect its an offset of the possibility of Edwards endorsing Clinton?
|
nonconformist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. An Edwards endorsement would be much more significant, thankfully |
|
Richardson just doesn't have the following or the influence that Edwards has. I was strongly for Edwards before he dropped... I really hope he endorses Clinton soon.
|
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:02 PM
Response to Original message |
6. Didn't New Mexico pick Hillary? |
|
Just askin :shrug: Voters'will ain't what it used to be.
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
LulaMay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 04:31 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
13. So, by their own arguement, shouldn't he have to go for Hillary? What a joke. |
robbedvoter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 06:34 AM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Yup. Like, say, Ted Kennedy and Kerry. But the argument only applies when it favors |
|
their guy. This back and forth reminds me a lot of Florida 2000: the results had to be interpreted restrictively (the law rules) where it would otherwise favor Gore - but liberally (a county where election workers corrected incomplete ballots) - because it favored W. And MSM was touting both contradictory arguments at the same time 9without exp-laining who wins from both). Just like now - with Fla, Mi and the SD...
|
rodeodance
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:09 PM
Response to Original message |
7. I think it will be important--nothing to dismiss- |
SaveOurDemocracy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:12 PM
Response to Original message |
9. He's job hunting ... opportunistic move on his part. |
|
:shrug: A disappointment ... but Hillary will push on in spite of all the knives in her back.
|
Justyce
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 06:30 PM
Response to Original message |
10. Richardson is pro-NAFTA and |
|
I don't think he has a very popular stance on immigration, to name a couple of problems with him. I don't think he would be the best choice for VP if Obama wins the nomination. JMHO.
|
LadyVT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Mar-21-08 09:32 PM
Response to Original message |
11. I'm sure he was promised a post in Obama's administration. |
|
New Mexico AND Hispanics are going for Clinton.
|
libbygurl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #11 |
16. It sounds awfully like a very personal and petty reason. nt |
LulaMay
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 04:30 AM
Response to Original message |
12. What an opportunistic back stabbing loyal 'friend'. What a wanna be VP. |
libbygurl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:08 AM
Response to Original message |
15. Notice how that endorsement was trumpeted loudly by the media everywhere, but Rep John Murtha's |
|
...significant endorsement of Hillary was just a blip and merited no big announcements?
I like someone's description of BR - an overstuffed burrito - LOL. I used to like BR, but I suspect his choice of BO has much to do with his not getting the VP slot with HRC. To think he got big political boost during Bill C's presidency.
|
goldcanyonaz
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Sat Mar-22-08 10:09 AM
Response to Original message |
17. Where were the fashion police yesterday when Richardson took the stage? He looked like a fool. |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Sep 18th 2025, 01:57 PM
Response to Original message |