Finder
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-21-05 07:18 PM
Original message |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-21-05 07:19 PM by Finder
|
BlueIris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jun-21-05 07:30 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. Sigh. Old news, unfortunately. But thanks for point it out, Finder. |
|
Edited on Tue Jun-21-05 07:31 PM by BlueIris
I'm too scared to look at the actual discussion thread about that topic. Don't have to capacity to deal with what I'm sure would be the ensuing rage right now.
|
BlueIris
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 06:10 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. I am totally impressed. Read the whole thread: Not offended. |
|
Edited on Wed Jun-22-05 06:10 AM by BlueIris
Damn. Could it be we've had an impact?
|
Cerridwen
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jun-22-05 07:14 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. I agree - the posters to that thread brought up valid questions |
|
about the results of the study. I.e.,
- Fewer chores at home mean more energy to focus on work.
- Do women make more if they have someone at home doing the chores?
- Men who make more can afford for their wives to stay home and do the chores.
- etc.
It's a good thread.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Nov 24th 2025, 08:04 PM
Response to Original message |