|
that some people - usually men, but a good number of women too - seem to think that if a rape victim had just done this or that, or not done this or that, it wouldn't have happened. If she'd just a) locked her door, b) worn a burkha, c) gone to church that Sunday, d) not worn high heels, e) carried a gun, f) not been born into that family - then all would have been well.
Goddammit. People, rapes happen to INFANTS. They happen in countries where the women are sequestered away from men in lifelong isolation. They happen to women (supposedly) safe in their own locked homes, in their own beds.
Stop concentrating on what the VICTIM did or did not do. Is that what we do for murder victims, too? Do we say, well, if he hadn't been wearing that shirt, driving that car, living in that neighborhood, he wouldn't have been shot by strangers? No, we look at the CRIMINAL's actions and try, as a society, to prevent them from happening. Why is rape different? Why is rape the crime the VICTIM is ashamed of, not the CRIMINAL?
I've had my home broken into and things stolen. No one ran around second-guessing which types of locks I had or the things I owned or the hours I was home - they blamed the CRIMINAL for committing a CRIME. And I wasn't made to feel shame for having been a victim of a crime. The onus was on the stupid dickhead that committed the crime.
Why is rape the one crime that is always considered somehow the victim's fault, even when she was "safe" in her own bed?!
:mad:
|