|
yes, the name and record has been reserved for use in San Jose area. the buy in, these days, is a SSS, and I don't see that happening in the Bay Area anytime soon. but sure, you got $60 million and a plot of land to put a stadium on? (oh, and the ability to lose $5-10 million for a couple of years?) then you can buy yourselves the Earthquakes. it would be a great market to be back in (and you know single table will never happen in MLS, conferences make much more sense, economically, that way you get geographic rivaliries. to really make the next step as a league and become financially successful, I think MLS needs to find owners and good, downtown, stadia within the next 7 years in three of these cities: Portland, Seattle, St. Louis, San Francisco/San Jose (why not both, really?), Philly, Minneapolis/St. Paul, Detroit, Vancouver. If they can expand to those cities, over 5 years, and the developmental superleague kicks in more players, MLS could become a top 15 league in the world, if not top ten.
Billy Beane needs to run a baseball team, and leave footie to, well, footie people.
and we have learned that the location of stadiums is what is really important. they have to be convenient to where people live. Look at the mess that is Frisco, great stadium, great facilities, dead stands.
|