|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:32 PM Original message |
DID GEORGE W. BUSH COMMIT IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HysteryDiagnosis (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:33 PM Response to Original message |
1. If B.C. did then this baboon has comitted the same only |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
originalpckelly (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:49 PM Response to Reply #1 |
32. You and I both know Bill Clinton shouldn't have been impeached. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:56 PM Response to Reply #32 |
33. It's not revenge |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:36 PM Response to Original message |
2. Crazy question. blivet's committed offenses that he could be prosecuted |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:48 PM Response to Reply #2 |
7. Seems redundant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
icymist (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:38 PM Response to Original message |
3. Will the Dems impeach Bush if in power? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:40 PM Response to Reply #3 |
4. It's not in our country's long-term interest |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:48 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. I don't know about that. You lance a boil, doncha? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:50 PM Response to Reply #4 |
8. Do you think GW violated the Constitution? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:53 PM Response to Reply #8 |
11. I know he did, for sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:03 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. Don't understand |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:10 PM Response to Reply #13 |
15. What could be more damaging is violating it for another |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:21 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. What you're saying essentially |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:38 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Yes- until 2009, when we take the federal government back. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:01 PM Response to Reply #18 |
24. I read yours |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MannyGoldstein (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:52 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. It's Absolutely Necessary |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
davekriss (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:08 PM Response to Reply #4 |
14. I disagree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #4 |
20. Yes, it is. If you don't impeach him and throw his ass in jail |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Guaranteed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:59 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. That's why you arrest them in 2009. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:05 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. Too late. This should have been done when the recounts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Scout1071 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:48 PM Response to Original message |
6. Does a bear shit in the woods? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:51 PM Response to Original message |
9. Almost every signing statement constitues an impeachable offense-- |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 08:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
12. How come it seems so obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldboy101 (155 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:26 PM Response to Original message |
17. Nancy Pelosi says she will not seek to impeach Bush. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:58 PM Response to Reply #17 |
21. Maybe Nancy doesn't want to but you can be sure Conyers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:12 PM Response to Reply #21 |
27. Wish it were so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:18 PM Response to Reply #27 |
28. I'll believe it when Conyers says it himself. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 07:46 AM Response to Reply #17 |
34. All she has to do is stay out of John Conyers' way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Marrak (332 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:41 PM Response to Original message |
19. He had assistance... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LynnTheDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 09:59 PM Response to Original message |
22. As the chief prosecutor of the Nurenberg Tribunals says YES, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starlight (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:10 PM Response to Reply #22 |
26. ITA. How could anyone even consider letting these criminals go free? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
badgerpup (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:38 PM Response to Original message |
29. logistical question... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jcrowley (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
30. Important question |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Oct-07-06 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
31. Without question, yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
90-percent (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:32 AM Response to Reply #31 |
36. For the love of our country |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 11:14 AM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Amen, and I'm not religious. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sun Oct-08-06 09:14 AM Response to Original message |
35. The United States House of Representatives has a constitutional duty to in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat Jun 15th 2024, 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC