|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
kpete
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:36 AM Original message |
Conyers Accuses Carville Of Aiding Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
1. Carville wants to dump Dean??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:40 AM Response to Reply #1 |
6. no he did not ever say that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Norquist Nemesis
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:47 AM Response to Reply #6 |
11. And yet, that was the "scoop" on the MSN for two days |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:54 AM Response to Reply #11 |
14. yes, and we know how reliable |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Broadslidin
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:25 AM Response to Reply #14 |
19. Dr. Dean - A Suspected Road Block to a Clinton Presidential Nomination |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jumpoffdaplanet
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:42 AM Response to Reply #14 |
24. Sorry, but I do read it as Carville attacking Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
35. please point to where he called for replacing Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #35 |
42. Reporter: Should Dean be dumped? - Carville, In a word... Yes." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:22 PM Response to Reply #42 |
48. is there a reason |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cui bono
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 02:57 AM Response to Reply #48 |
94. So even though he said it you still accuse others of a Carville jihad??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 06:52 AM Response to Reply #48 |
99. After what fact? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CAcyclist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 03:27 PM Response to Reply #14 |
57. Hmm, he may not name Dean, but he's definitely talking about |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
grmamo
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 09:04 PM Response to Reply #57 |
76. you are totally correct, sounds like some people need to do some research n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tblue37
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 02:52 AM Response to Reply #57 |
93. He also has said that Dean is guilty of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
helderheid
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:51 AM Response to Reply #6 |
13. I really appreciate the clarification! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
17. Here's link to a NYT piece that says otherwise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:26 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Big Deal. Harold Ford says he doesn't want it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 01:26 PM Response to Reply #20 |
28. Personally, I don't think it's a big deal either. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:10 PM Response to Reply #17 |
36. please point to where he called for replacing Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:35 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. But Carville heaped praise on Ken Melman... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 01:59 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. He just called Dean "Rumsfeldian in his incompetence". Fuck James Carville... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:00 PM Response to Reply #6 |
31. Yes - he did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:07 PM Response to Reply #31 |
34. please point to where he called for replacing Dean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
37. Should "Dean ...be dumped, Carville , “In a word, do I think? Yes.” |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:14 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. again, he criticized him but didn't call to oust him. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:16 PM Response to Reply #38 |
39. saying he should be dumped is not calling to oust him? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #39 |
43. Where did he say he should be dumped? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #43 |
46. IN HIS QUOTE - for crying out loud, you are being silly. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 06:17 PM Response to Reply #46 |
67. REALLY! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 05:58 PM Response to Reply #43 |
65. Are you saying that the quote is fabricated? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:52 PM Response to Reply #65 |
87. briefly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tkmorris
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 12:06 AM Response to Reply #43 |
91. Come on now |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:17 PM Response to Reply #38 |
40. Jesus Christ, did you read the quote? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #40 |
44. I vote for deliberately obtuse. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:18 PM Response to Reply #40 |
45. no, I'm a literalist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:19 PM Response to Reply #45 |
47. when asked if he should be dumped, he LITERALLY said YES. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:24 PM Response to Reply #47 |
51. is there a reason nobody offered this up upthread? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. my second response to you (#37 I think) did just that: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:23 PM Response to Reply #45 |
50. Gee, let's parse this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:27 PM Response to Reply #50 |
52. no need - it's just it took 20 posts for someone to offer it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Coexist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:29 PM Response to Reply #52 |
54. nice strawman. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cha
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 06:19 PM Response to Reply #54 |
68. And doesn't speak well |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PVnRT
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:33 PM Response to Reply #52 |
56. Funny, I don't recall Dean saying that Emanuel should be "dumped" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Alexander
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 03:33 PM Response to Reply #52 |
58. So Carville's OK, because it took 20 posts to prove he wants Dean out? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 04:23 PM Response to Reply #58 |
62. my sun doesn't rise and set on what dumbass pundits say |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LittleClarkie
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 05:42 AM Response to Reply #62 |
97. If you don't care what pundits have to say, then why did you just spend several posts |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Starlight
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:31 PM Response to Reply #45 |
55. WTF? You won't believe it unless he says some specific phrase? Give me a break. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aquart
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:56 PM Response to Reply #45 |
88. Oh, don't try that trash here. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bluebear
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 06:59 AM Response to Reply #88 |
100. That is a grand idea. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cali
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 04:10 PM Response to Reply #34 |
60. Your inability to grasp the blatantly obvious |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 04:18 PM Response to Reply #60 |
61. oh, I grasp it too well ergo asking for someone to show the quote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 07:20 PM Response to Reply #61 |
74. Here's another Quote for You to Deny |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 09:54 PM Response to Reply #74 |
79. somehow |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:24 PM Response to Reply #79 |
85. Deleted message |
Bluebear
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 07:00 AM Response to Reply #79 |
101. Could you BE any more obnoxious? A simple "I stand corrected" would have sufficed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Elidor
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 09:43 PM Response to Reply #6 |
78. Blew it out of proportion, eh? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AtomicKitten
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:50 PM Response to Reply #78 |
86. no |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unblock
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:01 PM Response to Reply #6 |
81. i'm squishing your head! i'm squishing your head! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:01 PM Response to Reply #1 |
80. Carville is a Hillary proponent -- she's his future bread and butter |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
2. It's time anti-corruption, open government Democrats stand AGAINST the coverup wing of the party. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bahrbearian
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:43 AM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Carvilles stand on impeachment ? He isn't saying its off the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ToeBot
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:00 AM Response to Reply #10 |
15. I don't know about Carville, but Conyers is against impeachment now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Nabia2004
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:37 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. contradiction, more like betrayal, people want justice at all levels |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
John Gauger
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 06:12 PM Response to Reply #15 |
66. I think Conyers is doing the right thing. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 08:19 AM Response to Reply #66 |
102. "oversight" not investigations |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kentuck
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:37 AM Response to Original message |
3. Good he said it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jackpine Radical
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:39 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Carville is a jerk. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clark2008
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:28 AM Response to Reply #5 |
21. Something I've never understood... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 08:33 AM Response to Reply #21 |
103. He told her exactly how many votes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 12:10 PM Response to Reply #3 |
27. HIs "better half" is a War Criminal. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Benhurst
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:38 AM Response to Original message |
4. Thank you, John Conyers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
natrat
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:41 AM Response to Original message |
7. carville is human garbage and should be tarred and feathered |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
porphyrian
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
8. Ha! Conyers is such a great guy. - n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goclark
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:42 AM Response to Original message |
9. Tell it like it is Conyers ~ you are the MAN |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlooInBloo
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:50 AM Response to Original message |
12. I still don't understand why DUers were all a-fearful-twitter over... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
smoogatz
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:12 AM Response to Original message |
16. Carville's a mole. The DLC are traitors to their Party and the nation's best |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earth mom
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:22 PM Response to Reply #16 |
49. Exactly! eom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ananda
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
18. Yeahbuddy! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wetzelbill
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:48 AM Response to Original message |
25. I own "The War Room" and to see Carville fighting for Dems |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemPower
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:53 AM Response to Original message |
26. Public accuses Conyers of aiding Bush! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:00 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Letting Bush off the hook? Get real. Carville needs a few slap-downs for his comments lately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 07:13 PM Response to Reply #26 |
72. Okeedokee.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vidar
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 01:59 PM Response to Original message |
29. Good for Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Individualist
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:01 PM Response to Original message |
33. Conyers is right! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
David Zephyr
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 02:17 PM Response to Original message |
41. John Conyers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Count
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 03:44 PM Response to Original message |
59. Carville's latest for those who missed: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joe Chi Minh
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 06:43 PM Response to Reply #59 |
69. Now don't go confusing AtomicKitten... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MoonRiver
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 04:24 PM Response to Original message |
63. Go Conyers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
GETPLANING
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
64. Carville has turned GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bernardo de La Paz
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 07:01 PM Response to Original message |
70. Let's damp down the in-fighting and not make mountains out of molehill controversies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
stepnw1f
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 07:12 PM Response to Original message |
71. Thank You! Keep Up the Fight Brothers! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 07:14 PM Response to Original message |
73. Who wants to argue with Conyers? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Imagevision
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 07:58 PM Response to Original message |
75. Conyers is reading Carvelle like a cheap suit...! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
The Watchman
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 09:20 PM Response to Original message |
77. Wow, I knew the media wouldn't credit Dr. Dean...but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:06 PM Response to Original message |
82. Carville is a creep. Yesterday's news. He's a Beltway Bandit who thinks he's friggin Yoda. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Leopolds Ghost
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 08:37 AM Response to Reply #82 |
104. He LOOKS like friggin' Yoda :-) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ksec
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:08 PM Response to Original message |
83. Carville needs to just stfu and go back to Arkansas |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemBones DemBones
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 10:12 PM Response to Original message |
84. Thank you, John Conyers! Carville has been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CountDmoney
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:57 PM Response to Original message |
89. Carville is a traitor to our party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
upi402
![]() |
Wed Nov-15-06 11:59 PM Response to Original message |
90. I bet Dean is blocking Hillary behind closed doors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeffersons Ghost
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 12:07 AM Response to Original message |
92. those damn fools better not dump HOWARD DEAN! K&R, K&R... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BlueIris
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 03:41 AM Response to Original message |
95. I love John Conyers. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
zonkers
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 03:48 AM Response to Original message |
96. Carville, clam up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lonestarnot
![]() |
Thu Nov-16-06 05:44 AM Response to Original message |
98. Yeah! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 06:44 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (01/01/06 through 01/22/2007) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC