So tonight on my blog, I was posting what I already posted here on DU earlier: Michael Brown's dire warnings to Bushie about NOLA.
And, as I stated on here, I stated on my blog that if Bush could not comprehend what was happening in NOLA, is he really the one we want carrying the nuclear football?
Anyone, one conservative blogger responded to my post and said:
"Please refrain from describing the President of the United States as an idiot. You and your view points have more importance when you just state the facts or your opinion minus the offensive slanders.
Definition:
id·i·ot (d-t)
1. A foolish or stupid person.
2. A person of profound mental retardation having a mental age below three years and generally being unable to learn connected speech or guard against common dangers. The term belongs to a classification system no longer in use and is now considered offensive."
Here was my response:
"First of all, I don't need to be lectured by you on how to describe Idiot Son George W. Bush.
And in case you can't read, I am using the FACTS to back up my opinions.
And the FACT of the matter is that Idiot Son received warnings about Katrina BEFORE and AFTER the hurricane struck.
To borrow a phrase from George Tenet, the system was "blinking read" and "heads were on fire."
Yet despite all of this, even his own Communications Director realized that George Bush didn't understand hte reality of what was happening on the ground, and so he made him a DVD of the various newcasts from NOLA.
And if George Bush could not grasp what was happening in NOLA, he is clearly not the man to carry the nuclear football around.
If your point is that I am disrespecting George Bush by calling him an idiot, then I think you need to talk to Ann Coulter instead.
After all, during the Clinton Years, she called the incumbent President and First Lady "white trash" on MSNBC."
http://progressiveminds.bloghi.com/2006/02/27/mr-president-my-estimate-is-that-90-percent-a-90-percent-a-of-the-population-of-new-orleans-has-now-been-displaced.html