mucifer
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-10-11 10:14 PM
Original message |
Elizabeth Warren Responds To Rove Attack Ad |
|
Edited on Thu Nov-10-11 10:19 PM by mucifer
Run time: 08:32
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ltE1lKuUeE
Posted on YouTube: November 10, 2011
By YouTube Member: justaworkingdude
Views on YouTube: 32
Posted on DU: November 11, 2011
By DU Member: mucifer
Views on DU: 4897 | Skip the first minute of the video it's the intro to the show. Of course Elizabeth Warren does a great job discussing the issues and sticking up for OWS. Part 2 of the interview: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rCLXV31c5Dg&feature=related
|
russspeakeasy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-10-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Damn, if I was single, 30 years younger, 6" taller and $5 million richer |
|
She is one terrific lady.
|
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
17. She's 62. That surprised me. I always thought that she was in her late 40's |
bertman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-10-11 11:20 PM
Response to Original message |
2. I love the way she took the Occupy Wall Street question head on. REC. nt |
SoapBox
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-10-11 11:45 PM
Response to Original message |
|
...I wish you were out here in California.
|
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Nov-10-11 11:58 PM
Response to Original message |
4. What was up with those reporters? Man how much were they paid to attack and ask |
|
loaded questions designed to try to play gothchya. Are those the reporters Sarah Palin was talking about being attack dogs? So much for liberal media.. LOL.
|
tomg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
8. I honestly did not find the reporters to |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-11-11 12:19 AM by tomg
Be out of line. The one minor one, for me anyhow, was when they buried the words all and tactics in the questions on OWS, and it, in fact, gave her a great chance to address the issue. When they asked about outside influence, it allowed her to respond beautifully. I actually found them honest questions that - because of her responses - and her remarkable ability to speak coherently, intelligently and with consideration, showed me that here was a candidate who was not thinking in terms of the sound byte. She just knocked me out.
|
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 04:23 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. They were loaded questions... Fortunately, she's the smartest one in the room. |
tomg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #9 |
11. I can see how they would be loaded |
|
For someone who is trying to win over that small slice of voters that everyone seems to vie for; however, those questions also allowed her to firmly agree with the aspirations and goals of OWS. I wish more Dems and Progressives would show the same kind of support and backbone. Well, even if we disagree on whether the questions were fair, we sure as hell agree that she was the smartest person in the room ( I would say she is the smartest person I have seen run for office, including Presidents Obama and Clinton, and I go back a long way.)
|
valerief
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
19. The whole freakin' media is loaded in Wall St's favor. nt |
dddem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 09:43 PM
Response to Reply #8 |
|
I was expecting her to respond to the bias in the ad, not so much the reporters' questions, but she didn't stray from her message. Good for her. I also think the reporters set her up (intentionally or not) to show her smarts - she was spot on, never hesitated, and showed her resolve (I should confess, I do have a crush on Ed Hardy, so I'm going to assume this was done on purpose).
|
PuraVidaDreamin
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 07:06 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
13. They be good friends of Gail Huff |
|
Former channel 5 reporter and wife of Scott Brown.
|
glowing
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Ahh.. now it makes sense why the snark was inflected in their questions. |
Lorien
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #4 |
16. I agree; the woman host was implying that Rove's accusations about OWS were true |
|
and she behaved as if anyone who aligned themselves with OWS was some sort of radical.
|
zentrum
(125 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 12:02 AM
Response to Original message |
tomg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
6. Thanks for the link to the second part. |
|
It is even better. She is off--the-wall intelligent and articulate. In a way, it was funny because on the pop question part, she gets the personal, irrelevant question wrong and all the substance ones right and then goes on to explain and consider them. Actually, in style, she reminds me of Bill Clinton ( although her substance is better and her presentation is , I find, clearer).
|
Iwillnevergiveup
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 12:09 AM
Response to Original message |
|
to snarky interviewers. Never lost her poise. She's gonna win!
K&R
|
CHOCOLATMIMOSA
(96 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 04:32 AM
Response to Original message |
Douglas Carpenter
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 09:14 AM
Response to Original message |
12. to donate to Elizabeth Warren's campaign: |
|
Edited on Fri Nov-11-11 09:15 AM by Douglas Carpenter
|
Martin Eden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 07:28 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
|
We need a lot more Elizabeth Warrens!
|
FarLeftFist
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 09:16 PM
Response to Original message |
18. Uhhh, can we just give her the presidential nomination. |
Denver Progressive
(97 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 09:45 PM
Response to Original message |
21. Elizabeth Warren is the real deal. |
|
I wish I had a few bucks to send her way, but for now I send my full support and I wish her luck!
|
Quixote1818
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
22. So if she gets into the Senate, what is the soonest she can run for President? nt |
midnight
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Nov-11-11 10:03 PM
Response to Original message |
23. I'ts nice that Elizabeth allows the OWS movement it's own ownership... |
|
She does a nice job explaining that she is for the middle class... All her actions support this too... She stays clear about all the reason she is running and it's for the middle class... She want's to take it to the senate floor and give them a chance...
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Thu Jul 24th 2025, 04:07 PM
Response to Original message |