quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-18-10 03:15 PM
Original message |
Yes, my eyes did deceive me -- oh well. (Sorry 'bout that!) |
|
Edited on Thu Mar-18-10 03:22 PM by quiet.american
I was reading the text of the bill that came out of committee, but the actual Reconciliation bill is in the form of an Amendment/Substitute for H.R. 4872, and there isn't a public option in it.
(I'd originally thought they might have managed to slip in the P.O. - but no.)
|
DFLforever
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-18-10 04:49 PM
Response to Original message |
1. If they include a PO, they'd lose the blue dogs they need |
|
to vote 'yes' who voted 'no' last time.
As important, a PO would cost them votes for reconciliation in the Senate.
|
quiet.american
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Mar-18-10 04:53 PM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. Yep. -- I had the wrong version. nt |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Sep 22nd 2025, 06:19 AM
Response to Original message |