|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:16 PM Original message |
Supreme Court Justice Bill Clinton? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:18 PM Response to Original message |
1. Shall we now blog that Michelle Obama |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Actually it does make some sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kelvin Mace
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
2. Actually, this is something I would support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
3. Isn't that nepotism? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:21 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. it certainly would be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:22 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Well then as a liberal progressive who detests racism... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
liberalnurse
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:24 PM Response to Reply #5 |
9. Bobby Kennedy was US Attorney General |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Sure. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #9 |
30. And this is why the anti-nepotism law was passed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:54 PM Response to Reply #9 |
43. Yes, well, AG and Pres are both Executive. This would be two of the three branches. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
geardaddy
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:44 PM Response to Reply #3 |
32. Sorry, dupe. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheDebbieDee
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:20 PM Response to Original message |
4. Not that he deserved to be, but wasn't President Clinton |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MrCoffee
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
22. anyone can be nominated...and if the Senate confirms, they're in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hangingon
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:43 PM Response to Reply #4 |
31. Wasn't he disbarred in Arkansas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyrone Slothrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:50 PM Response to Reply #31 |
40. He was disbarred twice; once by Arkansas, once directly by SCOTUS n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyrone Slothrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:21 PM Response to Original message |
6. Wasn't he disbarred by SCOTUS in 2001? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #6 |
19. You don't even have to be a lawyer to be on the SC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyrone Slothrop
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:49 PM Response to Reply #19 |
39. I know that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
8. I would support it, if only to piss off republicans! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:26 PM Response to Original message |
12. Why? So He Can Trade Dirty Jokes with Thomas? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #12 |
15. I agree she is suited |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:58 PM Response to Reply #15 |
44. Bravo! Maybe President Obama or President Edwards could nominate her. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sentelle
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #15 |
51. agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:27 PM Response to Original message |
13. I'd love to see him on the SCOTUS, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:29 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. I think it's a great idea but wonder if his past would get in the way. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:31 PM Response to Reply #14 |
20. I also thought about that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #20 |
23. He was, suspended for 5 years: |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
25. His suspension was over a while ago, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #13 |
37. The law on nepotism which was passed in 1967 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SharonRB
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 07:11 PM Response to Reply #37 |
52. Thanks for the clarification |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:29 PM Response to Original message |
16. I would use bush logic and get an acceptable person that will live |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Demeter
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #16 |
18. Good Point! Say, Patrick Fitzgerald? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
salin
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #16 |
21. Robert Kennedy Jr? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kokonoe
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #16 |
50. Women live longer than men on average. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:30 PM Response to Original message |
17. I'd LOVE it!!! Hell, if Taft can do it, why not Bill? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 03:01 PM Response to Reply #17 |
46. Well, was Mrs Taft running for the office of Chief Executive when her Bill was Chief Justice? n/m |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MADem
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 03:06 PM Response to Reply #46 |
47. Well, did you read my last sentence of my post? NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #47 |
49. Well, yes I did, and you're right, that would be very amusing indeed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fightindonkey
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:37 PM Response to Original message |
24. This Is From That Tabloid Book About Hillary Four Years Ago. Total Nonsense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #24 |
36. Did you even read the OP? It's from today; people are speculating. That's all. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
26. I think we should be doing what they did for Raygun. Re-name |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
27. Do you really see Bill Clinton being one of 9 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
no_hypocrisy
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
28. Clinton WAS a constitutional law professor at the University of Arkansas. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
applegrove
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:42 PM Response to Original message |
29. Didn't he have to give up is licence to practice law because of the Lewinsky scandal? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
babylonsister
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
34. Yes, for 5 years. Then he had to apply for reinstatement, but I don't |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:46 PM Response to Reply #29 |
35. He agreed to give up his Arkansas Law License for 5 years. He's now eligible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:44 PM Response to Original message |
33. The craving for power never dies in some people. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Strawman
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:48 PM Response to Original message |
38. Ironically, he would be more of an independent justice than Chimpy's stooges |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:52 PM Response to Original message |
41. and Douglas Kmiec insights on this are based on what? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onenote
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 02:53 PM Response to Original message |
42. delete = dupe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jakem
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 03:00 PM Response to Original message |
45. yes. clearly he shows excellent ethical decision making... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IntravenousDemilo
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 03:08 PM Response to Original message |
48. This would be the most stupid, ignorant, boneheaded, criminal, anti-democratic, Republicofascist |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CorpGovActivist
![]() |
Thu Jan-03-08 07:26 PM Response to Original message |
53. Nominated by President John Edwards? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:48 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC