gaiilonfong
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:43 PM
Original message |
jlake
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
AX10
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:44 PM
Response to Original message |
2. OMG! Is that all you have. |
WinkyDink
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
3. Think Huckabee will ask for a re-count? |
book_worm
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
4. if you can provide some evidence then I'll take you seriously |
Truth2Tell
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
Stinky The Clown
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
Ioo
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:45 PM
Response to Original message |
7. Live Chickens like tuna salad |
|
See I can make pointless statements too
|
Pavulon
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
|
Invalidate the process rather than examine the trends and see why people may have voted differently than they polled.
Come on, this really is a slack way to respond.
|
OzarkDem
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
9. Remind me of what Obama did about election fraud |
|
I doubt that's what happened this time, but perhaps he should rethink his position of remaining silent on the issue.
|
avaistheone1
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
13. I agree this voting machine fraud issue is going to come to bite all these Dems in butt. |
|
How many of them of done anything about it?
We're to blame too. How many of us have a handle on this issue? Most Dems'level of interest and knowledge is pathetic.
No wonder the voting machines can continue to work for their corporate and Republican masters.
This is a no brainer.
|
ImpeechBush
(99 posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
10. This is a joke, right? |
annabanana
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:03 AM
Response to Reply #10 |
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:46 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Yes, and there is nothing you can do to stop Hillary from stealing the White House |
Raiden
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message |
12. Just stupid. Hillary won fair and square! |
|
I couldn't be more upset right now, but why would Diebold let McCain win and Romney (the Republican establishment's choice) lose? Just be gracious and accept that Hillary did the impossible...don't minimize her amazing victory!
|
Lex
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:51 PM
Response to Original message |
Marrah_G
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
15. No... Democracy won tonight |
|
Record numbers of voters came out to have their say. These folks don't normally vote in primaries and therefore where not counted in the polls.
There is no conspiracy, just good old fashioned democracy.
|
dailykoff
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Jan-08-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message |
16. So those record crowds turned out to be for Hillly? |
|
And then melted away? This does seem a little odd.
|
Maven
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 02:35 AM
Response to Original message |
EFerrari
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 02:39 AM
Response to Original message |
18. "Unbelievable" is so last century. n/t |
sjdnb
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 02:45 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Especially, given the Gloat-O-Bama after Iowa. But, we all knew it was a matter of time before substance caught up with celebrity.
|
Donnachaidh
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:01 AM
Response to Original message |
20. feasting on sour grapes? |
|
After all, that 15 point lead Obama supporters were claiming just.wasn't.there. So of course it's GOT to be something else?
|
Perry Logan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message |
21. So why didn't any of the Obama people see this coming? |
hayu_lol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #21 |
22. So why didn't Dennis do something about Diebold? |
|
After all, Diebold does it's dirty business in Ohio.
Gee, you would think some of these naysayers would be more comfortable at freerepublic. You can say almost anything there.
|
Snarkturian Clone
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:06 AM
Response to Original message |
24. If you believe all the elections are going to be rigged, |
|
why bicker over candidates? The repuke nominee would win no matter what right?
Seems like a big waste of time and energy to argue over all these candidates if Diebold is going to decide it...
|
Freddie Stubbs
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:11 AM
Response to Original message |
25. Diebold backed McCain? |
LostinVA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 08:13 AM
Response to Original message |
26. You can make alot of whine out of those sour grapes |
Imagevision
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:50 AM
Response to Original message |
27. Bottomline: Diebold continues to control elections, "we'll just have to trust them"...or |
|
go bat-shit when Hillary is upumteen % over the repug candidate and on election day, we'll be informed that the polls got it all wrong. Is that what it'll take?
|
Beelzebud
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message |
28. People like you are turning a real issue into a joke. |
|
Good luck reforming the system when you sound like an uninformed conspiracy theorist.
|
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message |
29. So Diebold now works for the Democrats? |
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #29 |
30. Depends on how one perceives the term, and the aim |
Zywiec
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #30 |
33. So who will they work for in November? n/t |
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #33 |
36. Whomever the behind the scenes corporatists decide we've "elected" |
|
"We got a thousand points of light for the homeless man We got a kinder, gentler machine-gun-hand" ~ Neil Young
|
JackRiddler
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message |
31. The mere fact that their machines were used was their victory... |
|
including the model that was the very same one exposed as infinitely vulnerable to no-evidence fixing in the HBO documentary.
That seven years into the exposure of the potentials for electronic vote fraud these machines are still in use anywhere (still being purchased in some places) is a clear enough victory.
|
Clinton Crusader
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:56 AM
Response to Original message |
32. I wasn't aware Deibold had switched party affiliations. n/t |
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #32 |
34. There is only one party - the corporate party, w/2 right wings |
Elspeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message |
35. The exit polls agreed with the results. There is no voter fraud issue |
|
If you're pissed off, be angry at the media that built up the pre-election polls into a big bloody deal.
|
Echo In Light
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #35 |
37. Incidentally, I'm not personally angry over NH, and haven't researched polls... |
|
Because in this instance I don't see it as being that crucial. Irrespective of candidates, electronic voting obviously needs to be done away with.
|
Elspeth
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Jan-09-08 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #37 |
38. I'm with you on electronic voting. That is why we need to pick our cases carefully |
|
and not cry wolf over every election result we may not like.
The 2000 election was destroyed by the Supreme Court. The 2004 seems to have been a result of voter fraud on many levels, including the Dielbold machines.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Mon Jun 17th 2024, 01:48 AM
Response to Original message |