|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:17 AM Original message |
Hillary's dog whistles to racism. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:19 AM Response to Original message |
1. Can i have back the time I wasted reading this??? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:22 AM Original message |
You can't leave the race card out. Race is what it is all aboutt...unfortunately. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
acmavm
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:24 AM Response to Reply #1 |
8. No shit, see if you can get mine back as well. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
earthside
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Waste of Time? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #14 |
21. Thank you for commenting seriously. I knew it's a very difficult subject to bring up which |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dbackjon
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:46 AM Response to Reply #14 |
27. Yes, there are Democrats that feel uncomfortable voting for a black |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:01 PM Response to Reply #27 |
35. I don't think "code" is quite what the OP means |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:10 PM Response to Reply #27 |
42. from the OP: The Clintons are certainly not racists. But would they promote |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #42 |
45. They are political animals, after all... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rydz777
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:30 PM Response to Reply #1 |
47. Agreed. We can start doing race and gender analyses (e.g. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
2. As a black woman...I have to say that I don't think White folks will let a bruva win. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hoof Hearted
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:54 AM Response to Reply #2 |
31. Let me tell you about my white, freeper inclined, racist, homophobic BIL from Iowa |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:58 AM Response to Reply #31 |
34. I supported Biden nearly from the front. I know both a woman and a black man |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #2 |
33. Here's an excellent commentary on that subject IMO.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
xultar
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #33 |
37. Don't get me wrong...If Obama were to win the nom, I'd be tootin his horn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. I agree, I'm in Edwards camp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KingFlorez
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
3. That's quite a stretch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bunkerbuster1
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:21 AM Response to Original message |
4. Make that a retard suit. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #4 |
15. I wasn't whining, just pointing out what seems like a pretty consistent storyline |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Fresh_Start
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:22 AM Response to Original message |
5. Re MLK Clinton was saying that rhetoric wasn't enough |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
6. Hmmm...bit of a stretch, but I see where you're coming from... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
23. Really Loaded Word Alert |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #23 |
24. from the OP: I agree with everything you say. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:52 AM Response to Reply #23 |
30. Too bad....A man's voice typically doesn't get "shrill"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MedleyMisty
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:57 AM Response to Reply #30 |
32. Yes, it is sexist and insulting. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:04 PM Response to Reply #32 |
39. Deleted sub-thread |
Celeborn Skywalker
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:19 PM Response to Reply #32 |
44. Damn, you're shrill |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:33 PM Response to Reply #44 |
48. Back at ya... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celeborn Skywalker
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #48 |
71. I apologize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:35 PM Response to Reply #30 |
49. Ummm...no. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:43 PM Response to Reply #49 |
50. Ummm, not really...the word is NOT sexist....try reading a dictionary... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:30 PM Response to Reply #50 |
64. Words have context, words have subtext, words mean things |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. Isn't it always such fun... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:07 PM Response to Reply #52 |
62. It's actually the hallmark of a controlling personality or an abuser |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Apollo11
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:23 AM Response to Original message |
7. I also thought it was weird for Hillary to attack Martin Luther King Jnr |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. No, she said that MLK was ok, but LBJ was BETTER...because he had the power to do something.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
9. I hear what you're saying but . . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #9 |
18. I've been trying to, but it's become pretty obvious to me that they've taken the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:41 AM Response to Reply #18 |
22. that analogy would work except for one thing... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 01:05 PM Response to Reply #22 |
58. Now THAT is complete horseshit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #22 |
65. Depends on the athlete in question, wouldn't you say? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
VelmaD
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:35 PM Response to Reply #65 |
66. ah...but how often... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
truebrit71
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:45 PM Response to Reply #66 |
68. I don't, but then again I tend to focus on the matches themselves.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lapislzi
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 03:33 PM Response to Reply #66 |
70. I would have to agree with you regarding individual sports |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TomClash
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:44 AM Response to Reply #18 |
25. I know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #25 |
54. I hadn't thought of it in that way, that the Clintons want to tweak Obama's supporters into |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madinmaryland
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:25 AM Response to Original message |
10. You have quite an active imagination. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TwilightGardener
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:26 AM Response to Original message |
11. This is not a road we want to go down, Obama supporters. Obama won |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #11 |
16. Thank you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cloudythescribbler
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:08 PM Response to Reply #11 |
40. The above is mistaken logic, albeit understandably so ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
13. I'm all for reading subtext but this is a bit much. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:35 AM Response to Original message |
17. Yawn. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Old and In the Way
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:37 AM Response to Original message |
19. Interesting thing about dog whistles. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cynatnite
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:39 AM Response to Original message |
20. That was really close...I stopped reading after the first sentence... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Beelzebud
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:44 AM Response to Original message |
26. Bleh |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Samantha
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
28. A commentator whose name I do not know just said on MSNBC |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UTUSN
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 11:50 AM Response to Original message |
29. Now, why would you need a flame-retardant suit if you weren't making inflammatory allegations?!1 n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:01 PM Response to Original message |
36. The "fairytale" comment.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shance
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:09 PM Response to Original message |
41. What about the sexist "no woman in the White House" signals your sending? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
43. Very interesting post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:27 PM Response to Original message |
46. You're sending sexist signals, and Obama sends anti-gay signals. NT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #46 |
53. so why don't you spell out these alleged "sexist signals"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:47 PM Response to Original message |
51. that's part of why I find myself in the Anyone-But-Clinton camp... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mondo joe
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:54 PM Response to Reply #51 |
55. Ha! From the poster who religiously defends Obama's use of homophobe surrogates |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NorthernSpy
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:51 PM Response to Reply #55 |
69. gawd, not this shit again! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 12:56 PM Response to Original message |
56. I thought her dog got hit by a car |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 01:02 PM Response to Reply #56 |
57. from the OP: that's actually very funny. I hadn't read the sentence in that way. Back to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tyler Durden
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 01:08 PM Response to Original message |
59. Oh I GET IT. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BronxBoy
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 01:41 PM Response to Original message |
60. I Dunno..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kwassa
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 01:48 PM Response to Original message |
61. I think this thesis is complete bullshit |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
walldude
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
63. Bill Clinton was considered , at least spiritually the first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paulk
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 02:40 PM Response to Original message |
67. thing is - if you look for racism, you will find it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Barb in Atl
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 03:59 PM Response to Original message |
72. Interesting theory |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
IronLionZion
![]() |
Wed Jan-09-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
73. Primary season makes me want to puke. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Thu Jan-10-08 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
74. UPDATE: Rove's doing it also, but less subtly. Following what I said was a hint from the Clintons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
milkyway
![]() |
Thu Jan-10-08 10:49 PM Response to Reply #74 |
75. kick. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 16th 2024, 03:10 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC