|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
billbuckhead
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 08:06 PM Original message |
Poll question: Are America's gun laws too lenient? Yes or No? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 08:07 PM Response to Original message |
1. We need to shut down the illegal gun trade. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EMdamascus
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:47 AM Response to Reply #1 |
26. Yeah lets do that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Junkdrawer
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:07 AM Response to Reply #26 |
39. Here's the plan... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 11:08 AM Response to Reply #39 |
47. Federal government does not have the authority to regulate all private sales of used firearms |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #39 |
137. There are no "unlicensed" dealers |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlinPA
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 08:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. It's not the laws, it's the U.S. culture. Guns are seen as equalizers or ways to get even easily, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 08:34 PM Response to Original message |
3. Try the leniency out |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mvccd1000
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
4. There are some 20,000 gun laws on the books. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 11:10 AM Response to Reply #4 |
48. I know, let's get everyone to carry a gun and all will be right with the world |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #48 |
90. Do you have anything intelligent to say... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #48 |
91. Delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
WildEyedLiberal
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 11:23 PM Response to Original message |
5. What kind of stronger laws? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ThomWV
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #5 |
160. Confication of all guns will be the only thing that makes the anti-gun nuts happy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 02:42 PM Response to Reply #160 |
177. All guns...except the ones they keep hidden in their nightstands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 11:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. General question to responders... how many have actually bought a gun? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 11:37 PM Response to Original message |
7. Deleted message |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 11:39 PM Response to Original message |
8. Well, there really is no justification for anyone but military or law enforcement |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:08 AM Response to Reply #8 |
11. Indeed... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
85. Why not a shotgun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #85 |
93. Why are "assault weapons" inherently dangerous? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularNATION
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:59 AM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Should go? Says who? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:15 AM Response to Reply #14 |
15. Says me - and hundreds of millions of decent people everywhere |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularNATION
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:01 AM Response to Reply #15 |
17. You don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #17 |
50. I've got an even better idea... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:57 PM Response to Reply #50 |
86. But that is what we have already. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:18 PM Response to Reply #86 |
134. Which citizens do you have in mind? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
18. Replacing gun violence with knife violence is not progress |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:58 AM Response to Reply #18 |
44. The UK has 3 times less murder, I guess to some that's not success |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:14 PM Response to Reply #44 |
49. "Success" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 02:48 PM Response to Reply #44 |
178. You'll have to speak up... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:33 AM Response to Reply #15 |
23. Nice way to poison the well.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #23 |
46. Indeed, a classic No True Scotsman fallacious argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:49 AM Response to Reply #15 |
27. By definition |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:04 PM Response to Reply #27 |
92. Let's not parse words |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:35 PM Response to Reply #92 |
129. I have gotten dead drunk |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 12:09 PM Response to Reply #92 |
200. All such weapons are ALREADY tightly controlled. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EMdamascus
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:55 AM Response to Reply #15 |
30. Might want to check your calendar |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #15 |
34. "The people of America would never consent to be deprived the privilege of carrying arms" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #34 |
94. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 11:02 AM Response to Reply #15 |
45. Your definition of assault rifle would include most hunting rifles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
index555
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:40 PM Response to Reply #15 |
190. It's not the guns, it's the culture. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:23 AM Response to Reply #8 |
21. what an incredibly ignorant statement. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
24. You mean the law enforcement that took 45 minutes to arrive to the 911 call |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #24 |
97. Here's another thought... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:13 PM Response to Reply #97 |
99. Can I get some as bodyguards 24/7? Otherwise there will never be enough. Handguns though? Great |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
michreject
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:03 PM Response to Reply #97 |
121. I have 42 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:33 AM Response to Reply #8 |
25. Because we trust Bush and the State so completely? TOTAL justification thanks to him et. al. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EMdamascus
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:52 AM Response to Reply #8 |
28. What is an assault rifle? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:38 PM Response to Reply #28 |
61. An Assault Rifle Is Whatever The New York Times Says It Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:12 PM Response to Reply #61 |
70. Technical Language is a bitch |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:07 PM Response to Reply #61 |
95. In other words... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:14 PM Response to Reply #95 |
132. Pull Your Head Out Of Your Ass |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #132 |
136. The same one I always support |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:22 PM Response to Reply #132 |
138. So you're admitting to using a purely subjective and meaningless term |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:02 AM Response to Reply #8 |
35. BTW The 12GA shotgun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #35 |
53. Shotguns have their place - but there's strengths and drawbacks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:01 PM Response to Reply #53 |
55. Agree, A blowback |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:36 PM Response to Reply #8 |
60. As I first stated above, this isn't really an issue I care all that much about, BUT |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:43 PM Response to Reply #60 |
64. There are very very very few actual M16's and AK47's in private hands. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:03 PM Response to Reply #64 |
68. I pass a Marine Corps recruiting station every morning on my way to work, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #68 |
74. I qualified on an M16a2 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
benEzra
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #68 |
76. M16's and AK-47's are already tightly controlled, and always have been. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #68 |
79. If we were for supporting tyrants, usurpers, & the loss of rights, more could agree. Otherwise, we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #68 |
117. What does a recruitng station have to do with you not knowing what the hell you're talking about? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:50 AM Response to Reply #68 |
163. Why shouldn't a civilian have an AK-47 lookalike? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularNATION
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:34 PM Response to Reply #60 |
77. You don't know WTF you're talking about. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #77 |
101. Okay, I went and watched your video, all 10 minutes 53 seconds of it. Very informative! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #101 |
106. You realize a single us sniper killed hundreds |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
apocalypsehow
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #106 |
111. And I wager that "single us sniper" you're talking about answered to the name "Corporal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:43 PM Response to Reply #111 |
113. No it destroys your position |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:57 PM Response to Reply #101 |
119. Semi-automatic rifles are rarely used in crimes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #101 |
142. So you're in favor of burning the Second Amendment? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
east texas lib
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 08:57 PM Response to Reply #8 |
188. Beg Pardon... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DiamondJay
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 11:42 PM Response to Original message |
9. seriously, this is one wedge issue not worth it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Unrepentant Fenian
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:28 AM Response to Reply #9 |
22. How many votes should we throw away ???? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:37 PM Response to Reply #22 |
57. Gun control advocates here need to be careful what they wish for. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:40 PM Response to Reply #57 |
62. So....Which Democratic Presidential Candidate Are You For? (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #62 |
69. Too soon to tell. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #62 |
116. Using tragedy & fear to justify infringing rights of the people..what Neo-con are YOU voting for? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:20 PM Response to Reply #116 |
135. I'm Voting For Whoever The Democratic Nominee Is |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:34 PM Response to Reply #135 |
144. I wonder sometimes too - respect for those they represent is VERY important in a candidate. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:44 PM Response to Reply #135 |
147. Would you have voted for Bill Richardson or Russ Feingold? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:23 PM Response to Reply #22 |
102. I agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:44 PM Response to Reply #102 |
131. "Feed the poor, eat the rich." Funny, as a liberal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #131 |
171. "Eat the Rich" is a Fozzy song |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 02:05 PM Response to Reply #171 |
174. well, that explains it! I am an old fogey with no idea about the music |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
wolfgangmo
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:19 PM Response to Reply #9 |
100. a rational position ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Sat Feb-09-08 11:44 PM Response to Original message |
10. On a national level.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
EMdamascus
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #10 |
33. I'm with you! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
derby378
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:47 PM Response to Reply #10 |
51. Hey, count me in |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
52. Bingo.. None of those compromise |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
63. Hold Your Breath.... (n/t) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #63 |
73. Too bad the Brady Campaign/VPC/MMM/etc hasn't follwed that advice. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:42 AM Response to Original message |
12. There really does need to be an overhaul of gunlaws. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularNATION
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 12:55 AM Response to Original message |
13. What the Democratic Party needs... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:07 AM Response to Reply #13 |
20. It's a win-win for the Republicans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KharmaTrain
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:16 AM Response to Original message |
16. Many Laws Are Ambiguous |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:07 AM Response to Original message |
19. Compared to where? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:54 AM Response to Original message |
29. I vote for the SWISS model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:56 AM Response to Original message |
31. In some states, like Massachusetts, they are too strict. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:57 AM Response to Reply #31 |
32. If you have enough money you can buy around them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
conservdem
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:05 AM Response to Reply #32 |
36. I do not own any and really do not want to get one now, but |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:13 AM Response to Reply #36 |
40. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
37. The right to own guns is a LIBERAL idea! Personal Freedom is also |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #37 |
41. Too bad Democratic Candidates didn't... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:06 AM Response to Original message |
38. Something else - explained: "If cowardly and dishonorable men sometimes shoot unarmed men..." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:50 PM Response to Reply #38 |
66. A Little Reality Check For You |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularNATION
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:40 PM Response to Reply #66 |
78. Paladin the "bona fide" Democrat |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paladin
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #78 |
133. It'll Fly If 48% Of You Are Already Opting To Vote Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:59 PM Response to Reply #66 |
87. I don't need justification...it is not necessary when discussing basic unalienable rights. OP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
index555
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 12:24 AM Response to Reply #66 |
191. However, a single responsible armed individual |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kansas Wyatt
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:26 AM Response to Original message |
42. I do not care if someone wants to own a tank and shoot it off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KG
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:27 AM Response to Original message |
43. yes. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 01:56 PM Response to Original message |
54. Ah, Billbuckhead is back trying to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SecularNATION
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:44 PM Response to Reply #54 |
80. Billblockhead is a Republican |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Against the rules to call him out by name, but the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 02:25 PM Response to Reply #54 |
175. "Disarming honest citizens does nothing but provide work related safety to the criminals" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 07:59 PM Response to Reply #175 |
186. Ok, I should have said "Honest & responsible citizens". n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 08:17 PM Response to Reply #186 |
187. But the problem here is that the government doesn't ask "responsible" , it only goes on |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:19 PM Response to Reply #187 |
189. One murdered, two wounded & one suicide? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CTyankee
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 09:37 AM Response to Reply #189 |
199. I'm sure he had the choice of a knife or his gun. He chose the gun. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:03 PM Response to Original message |
56. Hmm, so far the pro-gun votes seem to outweigh the anti-gun ones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Joanne98
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
58. We can't disarm when we're getting attacked by a police state! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fedupconservative
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:27 PM Response to Reply #58 |
59. Do anti-gun people also support the Patriot Act? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:46 PM Response to Reply #59 |
65. They don't seem to have a problem with taking rights away from citizens. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fedupconservative
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #65 |
67. So you want to fall into the same trap? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Wcross
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:15 PM Response to Reply #67 |
72. By "your side", does that mean you are for more gun control? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex Talionis
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:26 PM Response to Reply #67 |
75. An unarmed man is a subject,an armed man is a citizen |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
71. Wrongheaded. I wouldn't care if everyone had a gun in their garage, if gov't treated them the way we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
-..__...
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #71 |
84. I just checked the BOR and the Constition... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #84 |
89. Check the commerce clause? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #89 |
165. But a given car is more likely to kill someone than a given gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:24 PM Response to Reply #84 |
103. People would be required to buy liability insurance for their guns. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #103 |
110. ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #103 |
115. "Regulate arms" in the Constitution? The Militia is to be well-trained, but otherwise? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #115 |
118. I don't think it speaks to how they are trained. Just regulated. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:01 PM Response to Reply #118 |
120. You're mistaken."Well regulated" = well armed/trained. Military exercises/evolutions often enough.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:24 PM Response to Reply #120 |
127. No, you are mistaken, well armed/trained = well armed/ trained |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:39 PM Response to Reply #127 |
130. Exactly, and well regulated means well functioning = most effective. The whole idea to limit the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:49 PM Response to Reply #130 |
156. Hehe. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 09:27 AM Response to Reply #156 |
157. Who says I don't? Either way it probably won't be secured by the 2nd. "Arms" certainly includes |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:04 AM Response to Reply #157 |
161. Why do you persist with all the double-talk? Why continue? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 11:36 AM Response to Reply #161 |
162. Because you refuse to learn. You need to drop the comic books, pick up the history books. Then we |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:00 PM Response to Reply #162 |
164. Which unalienable right is that, exactly? The right to build a nuke? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #164 |
168. It all stems from YOUR inability to understand "well regulated". After that mistake, the Nuke thing |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:46 PM Response to Reply #164 |
169. Now...let's see..."gun insurance". I would dispute this. 1) Why should we treat guns like cars? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 01:32 PM Response to Reply #169 |
173. You're just frothing now. It doesn't even begin to make sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 02:33 PM Response to Reply #173 |
176. OK. I will sum it up for you, again... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 02:53 PM Response to Reply #173 |
179. Right. But registration of guns leads to confiscation - a clear infringement of the 2nd amendment. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 04:05 PM Response to Reply #179 |
183. Thanks for trying to clear that up, but I still don't understand. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #183 |
184. Whew! OK - I think I agree - mostly! We do not have a right to possess any WEAPON we want. We DO |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #184 |
185. I know a lot people who want to argue for exactly that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 05:54 AM Response to Reply #183 |
196. The general line for "arms" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
index555
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #164 |
193. I imagine that the liability insurance on my private nuke |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Usrename
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 05:34 AM Response to Reply #193 |
194. If you have to ask, you can't afford it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
index555
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 12:32 AM Response to Reply #118 |
192. what about my death ray? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:03 PM Response to Reply #71 |
88. When used on private land, the government has no regulations over vehicles |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:09 PM Response to Reply #88 |
96. That old beater when it was built had to conform to NHTSA regulations. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 01:29 PM Response to Reply #96 |
172. They are built as safe as possible |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #88 |
105. OK -- thinking about this some more. Let's INNOVATE! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #105 |
107. Kinda like serial number. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:34 PM Response to Reply #107 |
108. Let's innovate: design the gun so that you'd break it if you tried to remove the device |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:38 PM Response to Reply #108 |
109. Why not do what the swiss do |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:39 PM Response to Reply #109 |
112. Why not innovate when you see that there's a problem? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:45 PM Response to Reply #112 |
114. Fixing the problem would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Irreverend IX
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #108 |
125. Some things just aren't possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #125 |
126. Bingo.(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AP
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 10:40 PM Response to Reply #125 |
155. i have more faith in the power of innovation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 03:17 PM Response to Reply #105 |
180. Technology is not there yet |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:44 PM Response to Original message |
81. Ban them all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 04:48 PM Response to Reply #81 |
82. I think dope is banned.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 10:01 AM Response to Reply #82 |
159. Hope you had your fun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:10 PM Response to Reply #81 |
98. Please explain... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 08:31 PM Response to Reply #98 |
151. Outlaw them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 08:54 PM Response to Reply #151 |
152. Please elaborate... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sellitman
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 09:58 AM Response to Reply #152 |
158. Compensation can come from the decrease in crime, deaths and the costs related to it all. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dimensio0
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 03:18 PM Response to Reply #158 |
181. You did not answer my inquiry. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 03:26 PM Response to Reply #158 |
182. Because that worked so well when they banned alcohol. Of course back in the REAL world, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 05:40 AM Response to Reply #158 |
195. Funny, that's how the Bush administration justifies Gitmo |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NickB79
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 06:07 AM Response to Reply #158 |
198. Discounting the death toll from the martial-law police force kicking in doors |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #151 |
153. Can you bring me some weed to that party |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
NeedleCast
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
104. Watch Democrats Lose |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billbuckhead
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:07 PM Response to Reply #104 |
122. This polls been up awhile and the pro gun regulation side is winning! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #122 |
123. You have a tie..(nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:25 PM Response to Reply #122 |
139. I think your wrong. Look at the poll again.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
baldguy
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:10 PM Response to Original message |
124. A community could have the most restrictive gun laws in the world. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aikoaiko
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 06:25 PM Response to Original message |
128. Just an observation -- equal again. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jamastiene
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:25 PM Response to Original message |
140. Ah, yes, this is going to be pure gold. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:27 PM Response to Original message |
141. By Reading This Poll I Would Say Most Duers Believe in Regulation of Guns |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:32 PM Response to Reply #141 |
143. Regulation is good...Bans bad.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
B Calm
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:37 PM Response to Reply #141 |
145. By Reading this poll I would say most Duers believe in Personal Freedom |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #145 |
148. They Believe in Regulating Your Personal Freedom to Own a Gun |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex Talionis
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 09:54 PM Response to Reply #148 |
154. Ok I get your sig now... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hippo_Tron
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:41 PM Response to Original message |
146. I think that guns should not be sold at Wal-Mart |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pavulon
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 07:51 PM Response to Reply #146 |
149. I should be able to walk in and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Edweird
![]() |
Sun Feb-10-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #146 |
150. There was a time when guns were available thru mail order. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Recursion
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:03 PM Response to Reply #146 |
166. I hate Wal~Mart myself, but why shouldn't they sell guns? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:59 PM Response to Reply #146 |
170. Unfortunately, that attitude... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LanternWaste
![]() |
Mon Feb-11-08 12:05 PM Response to Original message |
167. United States is the most armed country in the world... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cgrindley
![]() |
Tue Feb-12-08 05:55 AM Response to Original message |
197. I take it that the people voting yes don't have CCW permits |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 08:22 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC