|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Hugabear
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:22 PM Original message |
They LIED - the satelllite shoot down was a test, Gates now bragging about it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
elehhhhna
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:24 PM Response to Original message |
1. Does "prepared to share some technology with China" mean |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:28 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. What ever they can sell$$$ n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
poverlay
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
14. Lol... My thoughts exactly...nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jasmine621
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #14 |
37. Had they missed, missile defense would not have been mentioned. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
peacetalksforall
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
20. No, it means selling taxpayer boy toys and projects at a profit to Cheney and friends. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #1 |
22. I wondered about that earlier. Didn't a few guys get arrested for doing that,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
onethatcares
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:58 PM Response to Reply #22 |
28. doesn't the rightwing bring up the premise that Clinton sold |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:04 PM Response to Reply #28 |
31. I want to know whether profiteers are chosen in advance of state-sanctioned arms proliferation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Johonny
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:13 PM Response to Reply #1 |
35. I'm pretty sure |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
2. what other choice was there? n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
antigop
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:25 PM Response to Original message |
3. yep... it works.... if you know ahead of time where it will be n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tekisui
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:32 PM Response to Reply #3 |
13. And the weather's right, and the waves aren't choppy. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JorgeTheGood
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #3 |
15. and if it's above the atmosphere :D n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indy Lurker
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:26 PM Response to Original message |
4. not trying to argue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hugabear
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:27 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. They were trying to make it sound like it wasn't a missile defense test |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:28 PM Response to Original message |
7. Gates is lying but not for the reasons you state |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
fascisthunter
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I'll Buy That.... (nt) |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:30 PM Response to Reply #7 |
11. Yup, he's bragging-and the results have dual purpose, so? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #11 |
16. The same everybody else has |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:54 PM Response to Reply #7 |
26. "Our Shot Was Accurate!...."Our Balls are Big as Yours!" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:33 PM Response to Reply #26 |
44. There is an element of that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Breeze54
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:29 PM Response to Original message |
8. Of course it was a test and MIT Professor POSTOL thinks it's stupid! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Flarney
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:30 PM Response to Original message |
10. This all goes back to PNAC - Full Spectrum Dominance - Weaponization of Space, etc.. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:51 PM Response to Reply #10 |
24. Absolutely correct. And those PNACers will do ANYTHING to profit off such shit! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:32 PM Response to Original message |
12. What actual proof do we have that the "test" was a success? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:35 PM Response to Reply #12 |
17. Would you like some Hydrazine on your front yard? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:40 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Beats watching it come down in big chunks. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:53 PM Response to Reply #17 |
25. I thought there was general scientific agreement it would blast/burn long before hitting earth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:09 PM Response to Reply #25 |
33. No, that is why they said they needed to blow it up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #33 |
38. Haven't lots of them fallen w/o consequence? Aren't they obliterated into zillions of pieces? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:23 PM Response to Reply #38 |
43. Depends on size. Most are small enough that they do burn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:43 PM Response to Reply #43 |
45. This thing ain't that big (geez, sorting back to merely January articles was a task and a half). |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:00 PM Response to Reply #45 |
48. Many years ago I took a course that went into this |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bluedawg12
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #48 |
51. It's 5,000 lbs and had a 3:100 chance of killing someone |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:19 PM Response to Reply #51 |
53. Thanks, the same risk the Russian Satellite that fell a couple years ago |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:24 PM Response to Reply #51 |
54. I'm still swimming through the literal flood of propaganda to find the data,... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
paparush
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 01:03 PM Response to Reply #38 |
60. YES - Skylab, MIR, and tons of other Sats Decay and Burn..all the time |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cornermouse
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:00 PM Response to Reply #17 |
29. Forgive me for my doubt and distrust, O Lord.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:08 PM Response to Reply #29 |
32. C'mon, now. No need for that. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:16 PM Response to Reply #29 |
36. Once again hitting a satellite we have been tracking for |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:53 PM Response to Reply #29 |
55. The satellite was visible to the naked eye |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 01:11 PM Response to Reply #12 |
63. All we really know is that the satellite was destroyed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Iggo
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:36 PM Response to Original message |
18. And how does hitting something in stately orbit... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sgsmith
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:46 PM Response to Reply #18 |
21. Orbital speed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Orsino
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #21 |
61. And yet the satellite was a known object on a known trajectory. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KoKo
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:50 PM Response to Original message |
23. Most folks who've been around here on DU...Knew it was a lie... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
malaise
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 05:54 PM Response to Original message |
27. They speak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jeffro40
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
30. So what? At least WE did it, not the Chinese or Iranians |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:10 PM Response to Reply #30 |
34. Hmmmm.... no actually I didn't realize |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:20 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Unos pocos de frijoles con mis tortillas señor |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
endarkenment
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:48 PM Response to Reply #41 |
47. You are way harsher than I. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:17 PM Response to Reply #47 |
52. And this crap has gotten worst in the last seven years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
nadinbrzezinski
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #30 |
40. You missed the Chinese SHOOTING down one of their own |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hosnon
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 05:56 PM Response to Reply #40 |
66. If I recall correctly, the Chinese satellite was still under the direct mechanical control of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:21 PM Response to Reply #30 |
42. Excuse me? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ikonoklast
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #30 |
49. Oh. my. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BrotherBuzz
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 07:16 PM Response to Reply #30 |
50. The Chinese shot one of their weather satellite against our wishes a year ago, January |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RC
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
39. The real reason it was destroyed was because |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
sicksicksick_N_tired
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 06:46 PM Response to Reply #39 |
46. "MADE IN CHINA"!!!! ROTFLMAO!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ileus
![]() |
Thu Feb-21-08 09:09 PM Response to Original message |
56. I thought is was well know to be a test... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
4_TN_TITANS
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 12:26 PM Response to Original message |
57. yeah right... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
backscatter712
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 12:32 PM Response to Original message |
58. It was always a shot across the bow of China and Russia. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
59. He lied because NMD was a ground based system, which would only hit targets with homing beacons |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hack89
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 01:09 PM Response to Reply #59 |
62. What are you talking about ? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Paulie
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 05:05 PM Response to Reply #62 |
64. Ah, my bad. That was the earlier test done in the 80's |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DemocratDammit
![]() |
Fri Feb-22-08 05:17 PM Response to Original message |
65. Ummm.... Not to defend these goons... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Jun 15th 2024, 11:08 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC