|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Popol Vuh
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:46 PM Original message |
WTF? Obama's Chief of Staff: "give people a sense of what it means to be an American" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
gateley
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
1. I kind of get what he means -- that we would feel more involved as Americans |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mnhtnbb
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:50 PM Response to Original message |
2. As long as there are NO excuses for Cheney types with "other priorities" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LaydeeBug
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
3. I think this is disturbing, if only for mandatory military service is akin to a draft. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:54 PM Response to Reply #3 |
8. But it doesn't have to be. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:51 PM Response to Original message |
4. "Universal civil defense training"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
datasuspect
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. free labor? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:55 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. I hadn't thought of it that way |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Popol Vuh
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:04 PM Response to Reply #9 |
18. "I'm glad I'm over the age range" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:57 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. "civil defense" and "combat" have always been rather distinct |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hydra
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:18 PM Response to Reply #11 |
25. That's what I would like to believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Posteritatis
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #25 |
34. ... Like I said, Google please |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jpak
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:52 PM Response to Original message |
5. self delete - wrong thread! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
crim son
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:53 PM Response to Original message |
6. I think it's a good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
10. This is from 2006. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
progressoid
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:30 PM Response to Reply #10 |
32. Shhh. You'll disturb the righteous indignation. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MadrasT
![]() |
Thu Nov-13-08 10:32 AM Response to Reply #32 |
45. *SNORT* |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
UnrepentantUnitarian
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:57 PM Response to Original message |
12. I don't understand the emphasis he made on "defense"... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Neshanic
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
13. This is just strange. Is he taking long lunches? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 03:59 PM Response to Reply #13 |
14. What's also strange is this story is from yesterday's NewsBusters. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:01 PM Response to Original message |
15. Is this a Perry Logan production? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SIMPLYB1980
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:07 PM Response to Reply #15 |
20. LoL! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Political Heretic
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
16. First of all, this is old. Second ... I have mixed feelings about it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
angstlessk
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:03 PM Response to Original message |
17. sounds more like a 'universal volunteer first responders units' |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:04 PM Response to Original message |
19. Oh The Drama. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
leftofcool
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:09 PM Response to Original message |
21. No thank you Mr. President |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
22. The California Conservation Corp is a good example and model |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
SalviaBlue
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:13 PM Response to Original message |
23. Very Misleading. From 2006. Makes it sound like this is Obama's plan. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Popol Vuh
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:27 PM Response to Reply #23 |
30. And the last part of the first video isn't Obama just this year? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:14 PM Response to Original message |
24. When I was a kid we got training in civil defense. It had a good effect |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Ichingcarpenter
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:20 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. Civil Defense was big in Colorado back when |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:23 PM Response to Reply #26 |
28. We need more people engaged in their community. Instilling a sense of |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Burma Jones
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:21 PM Response to Original message |
27. Yep, you're going to have people from diverse backgrounds interact while young |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
razors edge
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:26 PM Response to Original message |
29. Just can't get over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Pastiche423
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 06:31 PM Response to Reply #29 |
43. I don't belive he can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:27 PM Response to Original message |
31. Civil defense against what? The governement that wants us to serve them? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU GrovelBot
![]() ![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:30 PM Response to Original message |
33. ## PLEASE DONATE TO DEMOCRATIC UNDERGROUND! ## |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jmg257
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:42 PM Response to Original message |
35. Was this a prelude to the "Civilian National Security Force" Obama talked about? And why not? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Vickers
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 04:49 PM Response to Original message |
36. Was he a member of the military? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 05:15 PM Response to Original message |
37. That's Rahm's crap and they're trying to pin it on Obama. Notice the related videos? Alex Jones |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Popol Vuh
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 05:33 PM Response to Reply #37 |
38. Any explanation to the last part of the video showing Obama? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Renew Deal
![]() |
Thu Nov-13-08 09:46 AM Response to Reply #38 |
44. Yes, that's from a completely different event and has nothing to do with Rahm. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JackBeck
![]() |
Thu Nov-13-08 07:47 PM Response to Reply #44 |
46. Especially when the OP clearly gets their talking points from NewsBusters. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RedCappedBandit
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 05:34 PM Response to Original message |
39. If the Gov. wants my service they can |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 05:37 PM Response to Original message |
40. I don't like Mr. Emanuel |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Lex
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 05:44 PM Response to Reply #40 |
41. Good thing he's not your Chief of Staff then! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_In_AK
![]() |
Wed Nov-12-08 05:49 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Exactly -- we would not get along. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sun Jun 23rd 2024, 06:50 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC