gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-10 10:53 PM
Original message |
How was part 2 of the interview? I was lying down but I DVR'd it -- won't be |
|
able to catch it until tomorrow. I didn't seen any posts out there about it????? Was it anticlimactic?
|
elleng
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Sep-16-10 11:13 PM
Response to Original message |
1. Kind of; about end of Iraq war, what we'll do about electricity. Will fix it before we leave. |
|
Said not called 'combat troops' because Iraqis taking over that role, and they have to be encouraged. After, Rachel discussed that with whats his name from IAVA, who disputed 'not combat' name, said it discourages troops.
|
PatSeg
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 10:47 AM
Response to Original message |
|
Not nearly as impressive as the first part.
|
jillan
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 10:51 AM
Response to Original message |
3. It was kinda weird - Biden stated what he knows and then Rachel had on a guy from |
|
one of the Iraqi Vets groups (sorry - having a senior moment about his name) and he said Biden did a good job of spinning. Biden did great, and said what needed to be said. He is so involved with Iraq as we all know.
|
gateley
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Sep-17-10 11:04 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. That's too bad. I'm sure Joe knows when he's spinning. He cares SO MUCH |
|
about the troops I'm sorry the Vet didn't realize that. Or maybe they were just talking about the topic in which case Joe WAS probably giving the "official" explanation. As always, I'd love to hear what he would say if he were POTUS or even still Senator.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Oct 01st 2025, 04:54 AM
Response to Original message |