AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 03:58 PM
Original message |
| A twit on CNN just interviewed Huntsman and I have never seen any case where |
|
a candidate got so much agreeable and loving attention. They seem to be pushing him now. One of her statements was "This is the first time I have spoken with you, I have seen you a lot, but you know, may I say you are just so nice".....
|
Guy Whitey Corngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 04:02 PM
Response to Original message |
| 1. "may I say you are just so nice" I can't say I'm surprised but. WTF?!! nt |
montanacowboy
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 04:08 PM
Response to Original message |
| 2. Was it that twit Erin Burnett? |
AtomicKitten
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 04:15 PM
Response to Original message |
| 3. Well he's next to rise in to the polls to the lead de jour. (Santorum is too frothy.) |
stevenleser
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 05:04 PM
Response to Original message |
| 4. Don't worry about Huntsman. He IS too nice to be the GOP nominee. |
|
Nice, smart and reasonable need not apply. No one is interested in voting for the guy.
|
WI_DEM
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 05:09 PM
Response to Original message |
| 5. They know he doesn't have a prayer. |
CakeGrrl
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 05:22 PM
Response to Original message |
| 6. He's next after Gingrich fails. |
|
Since he's only polling at about 2% amongst the GOP contenders, the MSM needs to give him a leg up.
|
AlinPA
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Tue Nov-22-11 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #6 |
| 7. She actually asked him if he was next, referring to Gingrich being at 3 % not long ago |
|
as Huntsman is now. He said yes, and he said NH will be the point where he rises in GOP polls. She (I don't know any of the CNN idiots)was gushing over him. Incredible.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Tue Oct 28th 2025, 12:48 AM
Response to Original message |