Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:39 AM
Original message |
Newt Gingrich IS the Answer! |
|
Now, what was the question?
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:40 AM
Response to Original message |
1. which unethical, pompous, self-serving, arrogant SOB |
|
will temporarily take the lead for the GOP nomination?
|
NewJeffCT
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. You forgot immoral and dishonest |
|
and probably a few other choice adjectives.
|
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:42 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
4. Nice start, right off the top. |
patrice
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:42 AM
Response to Original message |
3. Question = Which Repub is not the liberal-conservative that Romney is? |
|
Edited on Mon Dec-05-11 11:42 AM by patrice
|
sellitman
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:45 AM
Response to Original message |
5. What monster would leave his wife while she is in the hospital fighting cancer? |
DCKit
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
7. A serial adultering sociopath. |
Guy Whitey Corngood
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message |
6. What walks on 2 legs and is more disgusting than a puddle of santorum? nt |
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:49 AM
Response to Original message |
8. Who was removed, by his own party from his Speakership after being found guilty of 83 ethics |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #8 |
9. How many violations would he have needed |
|
in order to keep the Republican Speakership?
|
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #9 |
12. No idea. He did manage to beat the rap on one violation. n/t |
Jackpine Radical
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #12 |
13. Oh--I thought maybe he failed to meet the MINIMUM on violations. |
|
You know--like, the R's don't want anyone as a leader who can't chalk up at least 300 violations per term or something.
|
FSogol
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 12:47 PM
Response to Reply #13 |
14. Maybe, Boehner was sober and ambitious that day? I sure Newt is willing to rack up a lot more. n/t |
arbusto_baboso
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 11:57 AM
Response to Original message |
10. Don't know the question, but it must be really stupid. |
golfguru
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 12:08 PM
Response to Original message |
11. Will be interesting debates with the president! |
DCBob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 12:57 PM
Response to Original message |
15. According to Rush Limpbutt the old gaurd GOPers fear that Gingrinch as nom will cause big losses.. |
|
in both the House and Senate.. and they think Obama has the WH won anyway so Romney would be best to limit the damage in congress. What a mess the Republican party has become once again!
|
ChairmanAgnostic
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #15 |
16. Even Rush is right on rare occasions. |
|
Like this one.
I really, really, really, really, really REALLY hope they pick the newt.
|
DCBob
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Mon Dec-05-11 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #16 |
17. Yes, I think he may be right also. |
|
He is also predicting the old guard GOPers are going to try to take Newtie down.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Fri Sep 05th 2025, 06:31 PM
Response to Original message |