No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-06-13 10:07 PM
Original message |
| JMO on Rachel Maddow's show. |
|
Her show could use more guests and more panel discussions.
|
| Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-13 05:39 AM
Response to Original message |
| 1. I don't want her show to have |
|
more Republicans spewing their opinion. Michael Steele's take once a week is quite enough.
There is no worthy Republican position or opinion, not a single fucking one. And the entire rest of the media will not allow "my" side to even get a peep in edgewise.
I vote for fewer panel discussions on the Maddow show if they include the rightie lies. We hear quite enough Fascist propaganda from every other TV voice. Sorry.
|
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-07-13 11:02 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
| 2. The guests do not need to be Republicans. |
|
BTw, Rachel was responsible for getting MSNBC to hire Steele.
He acknowledged her on air for that.
|
| Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-08-13 03:49 AM
Response to Reply #2 |
| 3. Rachel seems to have a genuine fondness for Steele. |
| No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Fri Feb-08-13 03:56 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
| 4. Ginsburg seems to have a genuine fondness for Scalia, and he for her. |
|
IMO, that would make her eligible for canonization.
I just think that, whether it's citizen representatives from a group involved with an issue du jour, or Democrats or Greens, her show could stand more variety than having her talk to a camera for an hour or the better part of an hour..
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts)     |
Tue Sep 23rd 2025, 11:31 AM
Response to Original message |
Printer-friendly format
Email this thread to a friend
Bookmark this thread
