No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-20-13 03:25 AM
Original message |
Samuel Prescott Bush, father of Prescott, great grandpaw of Dummya |
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-20-13 04:15 AM
Response to Original message |
|
He was quite the citizen of Ohio. Makes me feel all warm inside.
|
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-20-13 04:26 AM
Response to Reply #1 |
2. You forgot public service. |
|
What the hell was President Wilson thinking, when he appointed a Baruch, a Wall broker, not a military expert, to help the U.S. gear up for WWI?
Another day, I am going to look a little further into Wilson, but I can only take so much in one morning,
|
rpannier
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-20-13 06:13 AM
Response to Original message |
3. In 1916 I would have voted Hughes |
|
Had the Democrats (probably) not stole California Hughes would have been President. Wilson was a racist and Hughes was the choice of Teddy Roosevelt. Also, had Hughes won it might have ended the Electoral College as Hughes got only about 40% of the popular vote
|
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Wed Feb-20-13 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #3 |
4. Probably a good choice. I would have to study up on it. |
|
1916 was still close enough to 1893 that racists within the Democratic Party and its kissin cousin, Dixiecrats, would have been common.
Martin Luther King, Sr., for example, did not switch until JFK helped get his son out of jail.
Incredibly, Senator Brooke, the first African American Senator post Reconstruction era (Massachusetts, of course), claimed within the past few year that he had run as a Republican in 1965 without realizing that things had changed between the Parties since Lincoln. (If he was that out of touch, he shouldn't have been Senator of his high school, ffs.)
|
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-13 12:56 AM
Response to Reply #4 |
5. Oh, dear. That should have been 1863 (Emancipation), not 1893. |
|
How come I never see these errors until after they post?
|
Enthusiast
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-13 06:14 AM
Response to Reply #5 |
6. I completely missed it. |
|
I would have been critical of you. We do not tolerate mistakes around here.
|
No Elephants
(1000+ posts)
Send PM |
Profile |
Ignore
|
Thu Feb-21-13 10:21 AM
Response to Reply #6 |
7. Of course not. That's why all my posts are so perfect. |
|
Edited on Thu Feb-21-13 10:28 AM by No Elephants
:rofl:
Some mistakes that I make only reflect badly on my typing. But some mistakes that I make render it impossible for anyone to get what I am saying. I wish that I could avoid the latter.
|
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) |
Wed Sep 24th 2025, 10:31 PM
Response to Original message |