Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Ranks Dead Last In Overall Social Spending

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 01:28 PM
Original message
U.S. Ranks Dead Last In Overall Social Spending
http://www.politicususa.com/en/u-s-ranks-dead-last-in-overall-social-spending

This report from the OECD and The Business Insider, could not have come at a more crucial time in our national debate regarding the federal budget and the course the Republicans have chosen to take.

The conservative pundits are trying to frame this debate along the lines that the deficit and debt of the United States was created by the liberal, nanny state programs. This is an outright lie they have drummed into the heads of the American people. Unfortunately, some of the pundits are trusted sources of information for millions of people.

The United States currently ranks thirty-fourth(34th) out of the thirty-four(34) members of the OECD in regards to spending on social programs, DEAD LAST.

The amount the United States spends is currently only 7.2% of our gross domestic product on programs that make up our social contract with the American people.

More at the link --
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
1. But but...socialism ......big guvmint .........taxes ........commies......
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Keith Bee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. !!!
:scared:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
geardaddy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:11 AM
Response to Reply #1
60. +1
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. And both sides..
are all over television giving reasons how they can make it worse..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:23 PM
Response to Original message
4. But we are Numero Uno in invisible bootstraps...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. +1000
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
5. this is important, crucial!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
999998th word Donating Member (555 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:05 AM
Response to Reply #5
34. You have the 'dead 'part right if lyin Ryan gets his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yes. We are the only first world country without socialized medicine.
Oh, but we're the greatest country in the world. And the freest and the richest...
All three of the above statements are false.
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Actually The US HAS the only socialized medicine in North America and most of the developed world
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 04:16 PM by murphyj87
Socialized medicine means that the government OWNS the hospitals and that physicians, nurses, and hospital staff are CIVIL SERVANTS, and the government tells physicians and staff where and when they work. In the US, you call your socialized medicine Dept. of Defence and DVA health care. Other than Britain, there is very little socialized medicine in the world. Most industrialized nations have single payer systems, not socialized medicine.

Canada does NOT have socialized medicine. Canada has a single payer system. Hospitals are non profit, but privately owned (many by religious organizations). The government does not own the hospitals. Canadian physicians are not civil servants. The physicians, themselves, decide where and when they work, as opposed to socialized medicine, where the government decides that. Single payer and socialized medicine are diameterical opposites.

If hospitals are independently owned and physicians are in private practice (both of which are the case in Canada) it is not socialized medicine.

On the other hand, with DoD and DVA health care in the US, that is the only socialized medicine in North America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 04:49 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. And you know that is not what I was referring to...
We do not have socialized medicine in America. It is not provided to everyone without profit. My mother has not had proper health care since before my father retired prior to his death in 96. If we had socialized medicine in this country, it would be provided for all at no charge. Maybe what I call socialized healthcare and you call single payer health care are the same thing?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #16
71. Yes You do...
Military and DVA health care in the US IS the only socialized medicine in North America. The US federal Government owns those military and DVA hospitals and the physicians and staff of those hospitals are civil servants, so the federal government tells those physicians and staff in military and DVA hospitals where and when they work, so that IS socialized medicine, completely different from what we have in Canada, which is NOT socialized medicine, but is a single payer system, which is the diameterical opposite of socialized medicine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:34 PM
Response to Reply #16
79. My point is
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 12:39 PM by murphyj87
My point is term you use, socialized medicine does not meet the real definition of socialized medicine. Americans demonstrate their lack of education and general knowledge by always misusing the term. If you get your nose out of your American dictionary and do some reading in a non-American dictionary (since it is even misused in American dictionaries because Americnas have misused it for so long), you will find what the real definition of socialized medicine is.

The true definition of socialized medicine (not the one you Americans always misuse) is:

The original (non American) meaning of socialized medicine is confined to systems in which the government operates health care facilities and employs health care professionals. This narrower usage, which is used everywhere but by some in the United States, would apply to the British National Health Service hospital trusts and health systems that operate in other countries as diverse as Finland, Spain, Israel, and Cuba. The United States' Veterans Health Administration, and the medical departments of the US Army, Navy, and Air Force would also fall under this narrow definition. When used in this way, the narrow definition permits a clear distinction from single payer health insurance systems, in which the government finances health care but is not involved in care delivery.

The last line, (single payer, i.e not socialized medicine) applies to Canada.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #16
84. American thinking and American English and Canadian thinking and Canadian English
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 02:47 PM by murphyj87
Of course, there are many differences besides the meaning of socialized medicine between the way Americans and Canadians think and also between Canadian English and American English (these are just a few I can think of off the top of my head, there are thousands more)

Americans have "indians" Canadians have "people of the First Nations"

Americans have "eskimos" Canadians have "Inuit"

Americans have "soda" Canadians have "pop"

Americans have "candy bars" Canadians have "chocolate bars"

Americans have "Chex" Canadians have"Shreddies"

Americans have "non dairy creamer" Canadians have "coffee whitener"

Americans have "Everclear" Canadians have "Alcool" (french for 96% alcohol)

Americans have "Ring Dings" Canadians have "Jos and Louis"

Americans have "Canadian bacon" Canadians have "back bacon"

Americans have "dollars" Canadians have "loonies" (loon on the back of the dollar coin)

Americans have "two dollar bills" Canadians have "toonies" (coin worth two loonies)

Americans have "unemployment insurance" Canadians have "pogie"

Americans have "bathrobes" Canadians have "housecoats"

Americans have "sofas" Canadains have "chesterfields"

Americans have "gutters" Canadians have "eavestroughs"

Americans have "Memorial Day" (May) Canadians have "Remembrance Day" (November 11)

Americans have "Columbus Day" when Canadians have "Thanksgiving Day" (2nd Monday in October)

Americans have "Thanksgiving Day" (November) when Canadians have nothing

Americans have nothing (December 26) when Canadians have "Boxing Day" (holiday)

Americans have nothing (Monday after Easter) when Canadians have "Easter Monday" (holiday)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
provis99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:09 AM
Response to Reply #13
29. hospitals in Canada are not privately owned.
They are all government owned, though some of them are administered by religious institutions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #29
70. They may be owned
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 12:25 PM by murphyj87
Most hospitals in this area are owned by religious organizations, the Salvation Army and Sisters of Charity the rest are owned by philanthropic foundations. I think if you do more research that you will find that your conclusions are not correct. Hospitals may be operated by regional health authorities which are at arms length from government, but are not part of government in and of themselves, but no hospital is owned by the provincial or federal government (the ones that pay the hospital and physician bills), unless you have a militray hospital in your area which may or may not be owned by the government as it is in the United States, but no non-military hospitals in Canada have anything but independent, non governmental boards and very few, and more likely none, are directly owned by governments.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #29
73. No they're not
Hospitals in Canada are not government owned and any Canadian who knows what is going on knows that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
8. we spend more on war than all the world`s countries combined...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bullwinkle428 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:01 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wish I could rec. 1000 times!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terra Alta Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. the solution to that
is to stop spending so much on our national defense and start spending more to help the poor and sick people in our country. The sooner conservatives realize that, the better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Author corrected 7.2% to 16.2%. Not sure where than ranks us.
Update: I used some information that has since been corrected on the original site, Business Insider. It turns out that the United States spends 16.2% of our GDP on social programs, NOT 7.2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eridani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:02 PM
Response to Reply #11
24. Only if you count Social Security as general revenue. This is bullshit
Or perhaps you have some other explanation for why it is listed separately on the W-2 form?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:35 PM
Response to Reply #11
25. Other Western countries have paid maternity leave for new mothers.
Many give stipends to virtually all families with small children.

There are so many other social programs including more generous unemployment arrangements, free college tuition for a much larger number of the qualified students, and so many other social programs that we would not even believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gormy Cuss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:54 AM
Response to Reply #11
56. Ninth from the bottom of the 34 OECD countries is where the U.S. ranks.
IOW, not as bad as the bottom but pretty far down the list for one of the riches countries on Earth. OECD's profile points out that the U.S. is far above average among OECD countries when it comes to income inequality and rate of population in poverty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 03:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. American "health care", I mean death care
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 03:48 PM by murphyj87
The US is also dead last in health care among developed, industrialized nations. France is #1. Canada is #6. Britain is #17. The United States is #19 and dead last.

Some Americans pretend that people come to the US for treatment, but why would anyone go from a nation where everyone is guaranteed health care to the only industrialized nation that can't even provide health care to all of its citizens? The fact that over 100 million Americans (38% of Americans) can't even see a physician, let alone have any kind of treatment, negates any claim of the United States to having a real health care system.

Tens of thousands of Americans are living in exile in Canada because they CAN get health care in Canada that they would be denied if they went home to the US. Those Americans choose to live in Canada, rather than be left to die in the US.

Americans living in exile in Canada

A Canadian look at American health care

Canadians look at Canadian health care, with oblique shots at American health care, which most Canadians make

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
raccoon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #12
81. Thanks for those great links! those are keepers. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #81
85. Kathleen
Kathleen, the younger of the two, with the son with dermatomyacitis, is the producer of that video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 04:28 PM
Response to Original message
14. But in the US, job #1 is corporate and wealth welfare via a grossly unfair tax code and wholly
irresponsible fiscal policy that have been in effect for 22 of the last 30 years: job number two is, of course, to gorge the MIC so we can exert global hegemony. You just can't offer even a minimally adequate social program when you must gorge the wealthy, large corporations, and the MIC, while global hegemony is being exerted as evidenced by three running wars. Hundreds of millions of American will just have suck it up and be be pushed into/near a third-world status for these monsters must be gorged. Please prove me wrong so blame for this bleak assessment can be attributed to just being a nattering nabob of negativism. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chervilant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
51. hmm...
While I agree with your assessment hereinabove, I've come to realize that titles such as "US ranks dead last" enable the hoi polloi--that would be us common peeople--to distance ourselves from personal responsibility for 'the way things are.' And, before anyone asserts that the uber wealthy corporatists and MIC are 'to blame' and are 'too powerful and have way too much money' for us to fight them, these--again--are realities we common folk have to face. And, we have to plan our activism accordingly. Yes, it seems daunting to rise up against 'the Machine,' but rise up we must--if not for our own sorry butts, then for our children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Curmudgeoness Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. And dead first in defense spending. Check out the graph
posted in another thread.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x288702

Impossible to comprehend this budget debate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ooglymoogly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 05:15 PM
Response to Original message
17. But we are first in prison population and incarcerating those who
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 05:20 PM by ooglymoogly
perpetrate victimless "crimes" and we make a lot more money confiscating the homes and property from the citizens who commit victimless "crimes" (so designated by our police state). Its all good.... Any body for slow boiled frogs legs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iwishiwas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
18. And the Repugs with the help of many Dems continue to bleed the 7.2% day
by day. Horrible state of affairs!!--and with the Repug Governors it gets worse!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
19. K&R'd!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
defendandprotect Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:44 PM
Response to Original message
20. DEAD LAST -- !!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
21. and that's still waaaaay too much for any republican
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
22. I'm all confused, 40% of my tax dollars go to SS, Medicare and Medicaid...
Edited on Sun Apr-17-11 10:58 PM by slipslidingaway
"View an interactive breakdown of where your tax dollars go in the Federal budget."

http://www.whitehouse.gov/winning-the-future/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:36 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. We pay so much money for our military, and the rich don't pay as high
a percentage of their income for taxes as people do in other countries.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:44 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. But that is not what the graph or calculator shows on the WH site ...
it tells me that the majority of taxes go to SS, Medicare and Medicaid. A quick glance tells me the military is minor in comparison.

:shrug:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #27
43. I take it you're not a billionaire
Cuz those making billions pay the exact dollar amount for Social Security as do those making $200k. Which means their percentage shrinks substantially.

In short, those who can afford to pay lots into the system are contributing only a fraction of 1%.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 08:32 PM
Response to Reply #43
90. Far from a billionaire or millionaire, but there are two sides to the SS equation...
what is contributed and what is paid out. Currently there is a limit on both sides, if we change one side, do we change the other?

Do we want to change the relationship between contributions and benefits paid and what are the consequences? If we change the relationship will it then be viewed more as a welfare program, just throwing out some questions we need to think about.

:hi:





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. The White House Has Put Out A Calculator To See How Your Tax Dollars Are Being Spent...
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=439&topic_id=910122&mesg_id=910122

http://www.whitehouse.gov/taxreceipt

Here is the other link, under each income level, according to this link our tax dollars go to SS and Medicare.







Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cui bono Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:52 AM
Response to Reply #28
55. But the highest income it lets you put in for single no children is $25,000
So it's very misleading (surprise) since you can't put in a very high amount and see that rich people stop paying in to SS after a certain income level.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #55
88. Limited options, between the graph and the calculator on the WH site...
it shows, for most Americans, the majority of their tax dollars go to SS, Medicare and Medicaid.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bvar22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:36 AM
Response to Reply #28
68. whitehouse.gov is a propaganda site.
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 11:39 AM by bvar22
The purpose of whitehouse.gov is to promote the White House,
not tell the truth.
It doesn't matter whether the Democrats or Republicans are in the White House.

It is a cool site to visit,
but look elsewhere (preferably the Foreign Press) for the whole story.







Who will STAND and FIGHT for THIS American Majority?
"By their WORKS you will know them,"





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 08:19 PM
Response to Reply #68
89. Certainly looks that way and we should talk about it regardless of party. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:09 AM
Response to Reply #22
59. Health care costs in this country
are ridiculously high. I believe they are the highest in the world, as in we pay the most for the least health care. Also we have crooks like Rick Scott who rip off those programs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #59
76. Health costs as a % of GDP
Health costs in the US are 17% of US GDP

Health costs in France are 11% of French GDP

Health costs in Germany are 10.4% of German GDP

Health costs in Canada are 10.1% of Canadian GDP

Health costs in Sweden are 9.l% of Swedish GDP

Health costs in Australia are 8.7% of Australian GDP

Health costs in Britain are 8.4% of British GDP

Health costs in Japan are 8.1% of Japanese GDP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #76
83. Thanks
That was what I was thinking of.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
csziggy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #76
86. And in those other countries EVERYONE is covered
Where here, a large and growing percentage of our citizens is not covered. What is wrong with Americans that we care so little for our own people?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murphyj87 Donating Member (570 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #59
80. I saw this by another Canadian on another message board. This is how Canadians think.
Edited on Mon Apr-18-11 12:59 PM by murphyj87
Jack Layton was explaining the idea of prevention as a cornerstone of health care to the Americans when he spoke at the Woodrow Wilson Centre in the US. The Yanks want to reduce health care costs, and Jack is telling them what the CCF and NDP knew decades ago - that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.

They can't be healthy down there anyway with neoconservative deregulation and emphasis on profits before people. How dumb it is to allow 70% of cattle feed to consist of chicken shit. That's what deregulation does. They've got to start using their heads for higher purposes than just hat racks in the US. Good health and quality of life go together.

(as does productivity in business - JCM)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatSeg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #80
82. There's no money to be made off of prevention
but SICK PEOPLE are so profitable. And if they aren't sick, big pharma will create a disease for them so they can sell a new patented drug. Don't you just love Free Enterprise?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slipslidingaway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-19-11 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #59
91. We should have had a full discussion of HC costs in the last couple of years...
there was no doubt in my mind that once HCR was passed, without discussion of all HC costs, we would hear about the out of control costs of Medicare and Medicaid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rpannier Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Apr-17-11 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
23. That's because they have no money for social spending
They're out of money once the bonuses are paid
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yngdip Donating Member (33 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:49 AM
Response to Original message
30. It is a travesty and a shame that we are
1st in defense and last in social spending :crazy:


However, there is hope. Not all politicians are shoveling the same garbage around, the Progressive Caucus' 'People's Budget' recommends single payer and defense cuts...so someone has been listening to the American people http://cpc.grijalva.house.gov/index.cfm?sectionid=70§iontree=5,70
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woo me with science Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:04 AM
Response to Original message
31. K&R nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:30 AM
Response to Original message
32. Wow!
Who knew? Good article to share with republican buddies.

k&r

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
33. This is why repukes suck and need to be voted out of office
with great haste!

They feel the social contract means they can abuse people with corporate power over the individual. This is followed by a massive PR campaign of lies and falsehoods fueled by emotions and jingoism. Lastly they rewrite anything that doesn't jibe with their lies and will even lie about changing anything. This used with their knowledge of the ever shrinking consumer attention span, causes millions of Americans to live life under a false assumption about the ruling party and how our government needs to be run properly for maximum benefit. EVEN with a report showing America in DEAD LAST in social spending...the repuke neophyte will look at you and repeat some lie heard on their favortie RW hate radio show, not to long ago. Then they nod their head like they told you a FACT and move on.

Funny how that all works.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Citizen Worker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:02 AM
Response to Original message
35. But we have more combatant ships, aircraft, missiles, guns and bullets then the rest of the world.
So, you see, we are Number 1, in killing and maiming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BR_Parkway Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:18 AM
Response to Original message
36. And that is apparently 9.3% of GDP too much according to Republicans
I swear I would not be shocked to see them trying implement some type of poor tax next
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PatrynXX Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:35 AM
Response to Original message
37. Which is why if Republicans were serious about cutting spending
they'd cut (like the american people want) the defense budget first. which they won't for whatever dumb reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pampango Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:48 AM
Response to Original message
38. "Canada spends 26% of their GDP on social programs." "United States spends currently only 7.2%".
The only good news in this is that it is something that Americans are doing to themselves (or, more accurately, that some Americans are doing to other Americans). It is not something that is forced on us by foreigners or other countries, but is something that we can change if we have the political will to do so.

The 33 OECD countries that spend more on their own people than the US, are all democracies in which the people have forced their governments to adopt progressive social spending policies in the face of past (and current) conservative opposition. These OECD countries are not run by benevolent dictators who magically keep conservative in place. Conservatives never stop fighting to lower social spending. (Indeed they are enjoying some success at it in Europe now largely due to effects of the economic crisis that Bush inflicted on the world.) So progressives can never stop fighting for our vision of society even in countries that have achieved much more in terms of a fairer society (like Canada, Japan, Australia and Europe) than we have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #38
62. except there is now an update
"Update: I used some information that has since been corrected on the original site, Business Insider. It turns out that the United States spends 16.2% of our GDP on social programs, NOT 7.2%."

So I wonder if we are still last.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Redbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #62
65. I believe it puts us 26th out of 34.
Mexico, Turkey, and Chile are at the bottom.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:02 AM
Response to Original message
39. knr!
we keep allowing criminals to RULE us...sheeple sheeple sheeple..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:27 AM
Response to Original message
40. Everybody now... We're number LAST!, We're number LAST!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BobbyBoring Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:49 AM
Response to Reply #40
42. ASU! ASU! ASU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dotymed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
41. This report will never
see the light of day by our MSM.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fascisthunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
44. but, but, but... our financial issue are due to soshilism...burp
no, our problems are linked to fascism and corporate power over "We the People" and our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:23 AM
Response to Original message
45. FUCK YOU KOCH BROTHERS YOU LYING SACKS OF SHIT!!!
Sorry for the rant. I don't think I've every done that before here on DU.

I'm so fed up with the lies.

I'm so fed up with the exploitation.

I'm so fed up with the gross wealth discrepancy in our country. In fact, it's starting to feel less like 'our' country and more like it's 'their' country and we are allowed to live here (at least for now)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:24 AM
Response to Original message
46. Best country in the WORLD!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
47. But we've got a world-wide empire and the guns to keep it that way!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BigD_95 Donating Member (728 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:51 AM
Response to Original message
48. might want to see the update b4 u email this info out
Update: I used some information that has since been corrected on the original site, Business Insider. It turns out that the United States spends 16.2% of our GDP on social programs, NOT 7.2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Swampguana Donating Member (361 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 08:59 AM
Response to Original message
49. cut defense spending
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Deep13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:09 AM
Response to Original message
50. Does "United States" mean the whole country or just the Federal govt?
If it excludes state spending then the real picture might be significantly different. Of course Social Security and Medicare, the two biggest social welfare programs, are Federal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladywnch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:36 AM
Response to Original message
52. tea baggers and rethugs are dancing in the streets over this news
if they had their way we would be spending '0' in social spending.......ah, something to shoot for I guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
53. No social-contract, no America! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
G_j Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
54. I guess being dead last is not good enough
for some, though the race to the bottom has already been won..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bobbolink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
57. Its obvious that this country wants us poor people dead.
I think its time we complied.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #57
87. There's no question that they do!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
58. Good.
:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:17 AM
Response to Original message
61. This information truly shocked me, Dems must use this
even if it makes our country look bad and we all move to France!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:39 AM
Response to Original message
63. Author has posted an update. NOT 7.2% but 16.2%.
Update: I used some information that has since been corrected on the original site, Business Insider. It turns out that the United States spends 16.2% of our GDP on social programs, NOT 7.2%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RedCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
64. We were lied to for decades by the puppets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
66. k & r !! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OhioChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
67. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 11:47 AM
Response to Original message
69. K&R n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krabigirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
72. But we are number one in warfare spending! USA! USA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
74. And when the GOP is finished, no one will beat us in that category
They will have us below most impoverished nations before they are done.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Uncle Joe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
75. Kicked and recommended.
Thanks for the thread, Donnachaidh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LongTomH Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:22 PM
Response to Original message
77. And is anybody surprised?
Hmmmm!!!!!:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-18-11 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
78. Wooooooo Hooooooooooo, we're # 34.....oh wait
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 31st 2024, 06:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » General Discussion Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC