You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #140: You misinterpret "Nurturing Parent" to be "Mother." That is wrong [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-25-05 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #138
140. You misinterpret "Nurturing Parent" to be "Mother." That is wrong
"Nurturing Parent" is gender neutral. It could mean the parent is male of female. It has nothing to do with the gender of the parent but with the character of the parent. "Strict Father" is in practice also gender neutral because mothers can behave in a "strict" or authoritarian manner, so the word "Father" in this paradigm description can be misleading.

Since you haven't bothered to read Lakoff, here is a link to a web site dedicated to Lakoff's theories. The Rockridge Institue's web site is dedicated to promoting Lakoff's theories http://www.rockridgeinstitute.org/ and here is Alternet's Interview of Lakoff and his theory "Inside the Frame" http://www.alternet.org/story/17574.

Lakoff on what is a "Nurturing Parent" (from Alternet interview)
The "Nurturant Parent" model goes like this: It assumes that there are two parents involved and in charge of the family. And it has a set of background assumptions: that the world can be a better place, that it's our job to make it a better place, that children are born good and need to be made better, and that the job of a parent is to nurture his or her children, but also to turn those children into nurturers themselves -- nurturers of others.

Now what does it mean to be a nurturer? Well, two fundamental things. First, empathy. The parent has to know what all those cries mean when a baby cries. Does he need his diaper changed? Does she need to be fed? Second, responsibility. A parent has to be responsible to a child. And you can't be responsible to someone else if you're not responsible for yourself. You have to be able to take care of yourself to be able to care for someone else. Being responsible means being strong, being competent, being educated -- taking your role very, very seriously. If you want to turn your child into a nurturer, then you want to make that child responsible to others, strong, capable, educated, competent, and so on. Then there are other values that follow from empathy and responsibility. One of them is protection. If you're responsible for a child, and you care about the child, you want to protect her or him.

Looks like Lakoff is saying that males can be nurturing parents as well as females. He is right. Males can go against the patriachal taboos and behave in a nurturing.

You must be of the "Strict Father" mentality, who associates nurturing with weakeness and women with weakness, so that in your view nurturing = women(mothers). That is the typical patriarchal word association.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC