You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fringe Appeal:Sharpton and Moseley Braun win a lackluster debate. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
unfrigginreal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Oct-27-03 02:19 AM
Original message
Fringe Appeal:Sharpton and Moseley Braun win a lackluster debate.
Advertisements [?]
By Chris Suellentrop
Posted Sunday, October 26, 2003, at 9:40 PM PT


DETROIT—I suspected tonight's debate wouldn't go well when I saw the sign that welcomes visitors as they enter the Fox Theatre, where the nine Democratic candidates faced off. "Detroit's Finest Entertainment," it read. It can't be a good omen, I thought, when the first thing you see before a political contest is an exaggeration—or more accurately, a lie. (Then again, after the Tigers' season and with the way the Lions are playing, Detroit is pretty starved for competitive entertainment.) The debate ended with a similar misstatement, when Joe Lieberman thanked everyone involved for "a great debate." In truth, this was the worst of the presidential debates that I've attended. The candidates were lackluster, and a good chunk of the press corps was inattentive and distracted. In a night filled with hilariously uncontroversial statements, my favorite was Dick Gephardt's "We need peace in the world, not terrorism."

The only candidates to have even a decent night were Carol Moseley Braun and Al Sharpton (with the addendum that, when none of the serious contenders has a good night, front-running Howard Dean does well simply because the status quo doesn't change). Braun fired off one of the better lines of the early part of the debate, after moderator Gwen Ifill apologized to her and Dennis Kucinich for not asking them a question yet. In a reference to the back-and-forth bickering among the other candidates, Braun replied, "That's just because nobody's mad at us." She managed to elude a question about her unwise decision to visit Nigeria's dictatorial regime while she was a U.S. senator by appealing to her trailblazing status: "As the only African American in the United States Senate, it was not inappropriate for me to visit countries in Africa." And she had the cleverest closing statement, calling herself the candidate who is "the clearest alternative to George W. Bush. I don't look like him, I don't talk like him, I don't act like him, I don't think like him."

<snip>

As for Sharpton, he was, well, Sharpton. He reeled off several of the best one-liners (though John Kerry appears to be trying to rise to Sharpton's comedic challenge), including a description of the coming fall campaign as a "battle between the Christian right and the right Christians." During the debate's "conventional wisdom round," when Ifill asked the candidates to defend themselves against their media caricatures, Sharpton fared the best by turning his provocateur-who-is-not-taken-seriously image to his advantage. Speaking to a largely African American audience, Sharpton declared, "In America, many of us are not taken seriously … They don't take us seriously collectively." It was the night's most effective parry. Then again, the most ominous statement of the night was Fox News questioner Carl Cameron's reference to "the coming Sharpton economy."

As for everyone else, Kucinich was irrelevant, and Clark, Dean, Edwards, Gephardt, Kerry, and Lieberman circled each other like boxers taking a breather during a bout's middle rounds. It wasn't fine, and it wasn't entertainment.

http://slate.msn.com/id/2090340/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC