You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #79: A KING’S RANSOM? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
54anickel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-01-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #24
79. A KING’S RANSOM?
http://www.cnbceb.com/Articles/2008/May/42/sovereign-wealth-funds.aspx

Oil money is flooding the west via Sovereign Wealth Funds (SWFs), bringing suspicion as well as muchneeded liquidity in its wake, and the conditions for a sea change in global capital markets. SWFs are capable of disrupting markets, yet they have little accountability to regulators, shareholders or voters. At a time when western economic growth forecasts have gone limp, the arrival of inscrutable strangers at the door is unlikely to reignite the party.

Indeed, SWFs have become the focus of notoriety and suspicion, labelled as “aggressive” and “mischievous” by the French and German presidents respectively. According to research by Stephen Jen, chief currency economist at Morgan Stanley, petrodollars are getting bigger. At $100 a barrel, the total proven reserves of the oil exporting countries is around $104 trillion – equivalent to the total value of publicly traded equities and bonds in the world.

About $48 trillion of this belongs to the Gulf Cooperation Council member countries – Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman and Qatar. The rest of the Organisation of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) – Algeria, Angola, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Nigeria, Venezuela and Ecuador – own another $44 trillion, while non-OPEC countries – Russia, Canada, Norway and Mexico – own $12 trillion worth of oil reserves.

The flows are massive too. At the current pace of production and exports, and at $100 a barrel, collectively, oil exporters are projected to earn a total of $2.1 trillion in oil export receipts per year. Given the modest size of their GDPs, the bulk of the petrodollar windfalls must therefore be saved and deployed in the global financial markets.

“There are two key implications,” says Stephen Jen. “First, the deployment of petrodollars is likely to favour equities over bonds. Second, they should favour emerging market currencies.”

“These two themes are identical to the financial market implications of the emergence of SWFs, because about half of the petrodollar receipts may be invested through SWFs, and close to three-quarters of all assets under management by SWFs are derived from petrodollars.”

A recent report by McKinsey Global Institute, entitled The New Power Brokers, identifies four key actors in the world’s financial markets – petrodollar investors, Asian central banks, hedge funds and private equity. Their rapid growth since 2000 has given them unprecedented muscle, and their size – currently $8.4 trillion or 5% of world financial assets – is likely to double over the next five years.

more...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC