Reply #20: What is the difference between "naked" and "sexual"? [View All]

[Trillo]

I've seen advertising photos of fully clothed females, that while they may be over 18, indeed looked like they were 15 or 16, at most. Fully dressed in "sexy red", with lipstick, eye makeup, and not a single blemish to be found. The pose and look is "sultry", sometimes even including a bead or two of "sweat".

Are photos such as these to be considered "pornography"?

If not, then why? They are clearly intended to be sexually suggestive. We've all seen them in multiple publications such as magazines as well as online in the years after Internet 2. So if the "intent" of the photos are foremost, then shouldn't these also be banned under the banner of protecting child exploitation?