You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #1: The plane was apparently new and had a de-icing [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
rollingrock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-15-09 02:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. The plane was apparently new and had a de-icing
mechanism on its wings. So either the de-icing mechanism failed or the FDA is somehow wrong about the cause of the crash. OTOH, I don't know if the icing on the wings would explain why the plane apparently nose-dived straight down, oddly enough, instead of leveling out before crashing, and why there was no may day distress signal from the pilot. Isn't it a bit odd that a relatively large airplane only struck one house? That's because it dropped out of the sky like a rock, which seems quite odd to me. Can any pilots or someone knowledgeable about aviation weigh in on this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC