You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #7: eh? [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
iverglas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Apr-30-04 05:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. eh?
"Although they are subject to prosecution under the Criminal Code of Canada, the law is untested since no prosecutions have taken place," the department says bluntly in its report ...

Well gosh -- the first thing that springs to my mind is that it's probably hard for prosecutions to take place unless there is some evidence that offences have been committed.

The Globe article doesn't make it plain exactly what the US State Department's beef is here, and Google doesn't find me the report itself. You tracked it down at all, Judilyn?

.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC