You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #24: But the U.N. was backing its own resolution [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU
jamesinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-03 09:10 AM
Response to Reply #19
24. But the U.N. was backing its own resolution
In reading U.N. Resolution 1441 it has 15 parts. A general statement and 14 conditions. It states in the General statement that Iraq was making progress towards disarmament, slowly though. Because no WMD have been found, the U.S. viloated 5 of the sections of the resoultion. Iraq violated none so far. If it is found that Iraq has WMD, not to be confused with programs, then Iraq violated or may I use the phrase "material breech" resolution 1441. If it is found that Iraq was purchasing WMD and did not report it, or the selling country did not report it, then it is a violation of 1441. This is why the Iraq- Niger thing is such an issue. Once again is was found to be a lie by the administration. Violation of the resoultion was to be decided by the U.N. and the degree to which it was violated. Dr. Blix repoting to the U.N. was the key to this.

Dean said in a radio interview on 8/25/03 that he will go to war if the U.S. is threatened and a clear plan from start to end, along with a justification for all parts of the war are presented. This is why he is criticl of the Bush administration, they lied about the reasons for war, and they have no clear plan. The U.S. violated resolution 1441, not Iraq. He has also stated that when you go into war, you get as much help from the international community as possible, Bush did not. This is another issue he has with the current administration. There is tremendus strength in gentelness, Bush does not have that. I believe every Dem candidate out there would go to war if it was right to do so. Iraq was not justifiable in most peoples minds. Bush got caught in his lie about Niger-Iraq uranium on 3/7/03 as reported by Reuters news service. 10 days later he got out of the meeting in the Azores and on the 20th the war started. He gave Hussein 48 hrs to give up WMD that so far don't exist. Hussein was in complience with the U.N. He was not out of complience for 30-60 days. The war was not justified at all. Bush had an emergency meetin in the Azores which concluded 3 days before the war started. He was caught in his lie but moved so fast to start the war that the course could not be reversed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Latest Breaking News Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC