So why is 9/11 as an inside job [View All]

[9215]

so unthinkable?

What is becoming increasing hard for the Public to ignore is we have a President who is willing to lie to take us to war for BFEE enrichment. Cheney's gaming of the Iraq sanctions to profit Halliburton, then his push for war though Iraq posed no threat to the US with, coincidently, Halliburton getting most of the rebuilding contracts, shows the profit motive at work. Then we have Poppy's Carlyle group also set to profit handsomely from war.
In the background we have the philosophical "imperatives" for war. We have numereous Bush officials as followers of the fascistic Straussian imperatives for "externalizing" the threat to the nation state as a means of maintaining political control--the end goal. Then we have the Straussian imperatives fed further with the "realpolitiks" of Brezizinski's "Grand Chessboard" and PNAC "imperatives" for the US to maintain its role as the sole superpower. These last two imperatives can only be fulfilled by taking control of the Caspian and Middle East regions with military force. All of it designed to hide the reason for almost all wars in modern times: to control resources.

But the fly in the buttermilk was the need to garner public support for imperial adventurism and suddenly we have 9/11 expertly timed to serve that purpose.

If Bush is willing to lie and let young people die in the Iraq war, then why is it to far fetched to think he would let other Americans die on 9/11?