You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #5: "Through" means, in this instance... [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
davekriss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Apr-13-04 10:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. "Through" means, in this instance...
Edited on Tue Apr-13-04 10:51 PM by davekriss
When the "Status of Force Agreement" (SOFA) expires, the one to be executed with the puppet regime we put in place on June 30 (and who can name the last SOFA that was allowed to expire -- besides Saudi Arabia, of course?). After all, what do you think we're fighting for? Why, Dominion and militaristic hegemony, of course! We ring the Caspian Basin with bases during Afghanistan; and Haliburton is building 4 major bases in Iraq. Better to control the future flow of gas and oils, my fellow useless eaters and cannon fodder! Sweet Empire!! Bwahahahaha!!!

Watching Bush's head spin in a cheap imitation of Linda Blair in The Exorcist, out spewed forth a projectiling vomit of words. These words...

The transition to sovereignty also requires an atmosphere of security, and our coalition is working to provide that security...As we've made clear all along, our commitment to the success and security of Iraq will not end on June 30th. On July 1st and beyond, our reconstruction assistance will continue and our military commitment will continue...In terms of how long we'll be there, as long as necessary, and not one day more. The Iraqi people need us there to help with security. They need us there to fight off these, you know, violent few, who are doing everything they can to resist the advance of freedom. And I mentioned who they are...Once we transfer sovereignty, we'll enter into a security agreement with the government to which we pass sovereignty, the entity to which we pass sovereignty. And we'll need to be there for a while.
---GWB, April 13, 2004, aqvailable here:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/worldlatest/story/0,1280,-3974626,00.html

As Chalmers Johnson warns, "Plan your outs now, while it's still possible. Get a second passport; buy that condo in Vancouver!" The Sorrows of Empire will befall us.

(On edit: Changed "Security of force..." to "Status of force...")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC