Reply #11: Again, no matter how you dress up this, it's still racism and fear of the [View All]

[kayell]

"other" You have an obvious talent for language, or at least for mining a thesaurus, but your ideas are still as foul as they were in the last thread, as foul as those of any white supremecist with less talent for presenting his ideas in "scientific language".

You wrote "Should we allow the human race to continue to exist as multiple ethnic groups and allow it to freely continue to branch in that way, with all the groups coexisting productively and peacefully upon this planet with their beautiful lands and cultures that we can all take wonderful and enriching vacations to, OR should we continue enforcing the current policy of one uniform ethnic group only?"

And what exactly would your solution to this horrific problem of intra-racial breeding be? Miscegenation laws have been tried in this country and surprise they dont work.

You wrote "There is, of course, an additional factor which can either increase or decrease the probability of members of the same ethnic group selecting one another as mates. Media and educational influences have a huge impact. If the media and educational environment frowns on the concept of "maintaining and enhancing the genetic lines of your ethnic group" and most people are so educated, then the probability is increased for them to select partners outside their existing ethnic groups. "

And your solution to this "problem" would be? Maybe some media and education influences to keep the "white race" pure?

I don't really give a shit how fancy your language is, it is clear on a reasonably close reading that you are as racist as any Nazi eugenicist, as bigoted as any white supremicist, as hateful as the Klan. You can dress this crap up as "philosophy", but it's still crap, and it still stinks.