You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #23: I went with number 2 [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
JackSwift Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-03 01:47 PM
Response to Original message
23. I went with number 2
and I have a B.S. degree in the poli sciences and spent a few years on this very subject. Certainly there were McCarthyites and Nixonians who used the cold war for political gain, and others who used it for monetary gain. Those types will always be with us. But keep in mind that Stalin was one of history's most evil and dangerous men. He was never adventerous enough to take us on directly, but he did wage a low level war against us until the end of his life. Kruschnev was a harmless blowhard, pure and simple and he lost his job over it. Brezhnev was somewhere in between, and the Soviet equivilent of Reagan. He bankrupted the USSR by trying to achieve military superiority. He kept his intentions secret. I thought at the time that it was Russian paranoia, but I remember people who sincerely believed that the Soviets had an aggressive agenda and plenty of circumstantial evidence to back that up. The Soviets were an extreme danger to their immediate neighbors, such as Afghanistan and Eastern Europe, but for defensive reasons that only involved us because we rightly felt that this was blatant imperialism.

Ironically, it was the spying, and the Walker spy ring in this country that convinced the Soviets that our intentions were defensive, and our electronic spying on the Soviets that convinced even Reagan that the Soviets had defensive intentions. That, and younger generation of leaders like Gorbachev simply ended the cold war. The WWII generation remembered that a quarter of the population had died in WWII, and they weren't going to allow any risk of that happening again. And the world was a miserable place for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC