You are viewing an obsolete version of the DU website which is no longer supported by the Administrators. Visit The New DU.
Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Reply #40: What I've got is dispassionate observation of facts. [View All]

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU
Character Assassin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-03 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. What I've got is dispassionate observation of facts.
What you seem to have is an aversion to dealing with actual data.

A: Did the fund increase or decrease in value?
B: If so, why, and by how much?

A: Has the fund been raided at least three times by Davis?
B: Is so, why?

A: Does the fund meet behind closed doors?
B: If so, why?

A: Is the board stacked with Davis cronies?
B: If so why and who?

A: Has the fund invested, with no oversight, in companies of big Democratic contributors?
B: If so why?

Hint: The answers to all 'A' questions is 'Yes'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (Through 2005) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC