Reply #39: Willfull denial [View All]

[maha]

"In the case of 9/11, we have been told (no evidence) that it was Arab terrorists that attacked the U.S."

There is solid and copious evidence that tells us exactly who the 19 terrorists were. There is no doubt whatsoever. All were Muslims with long-standing connections to al Qaeda. Most were Arabs. None were Iraqis. What do you mean by "no evidence"? What planet do you live on?

It's true there is no direct evidence revealing that Osama bin Laden was in on the planning of the 9/11 attacks, but to say there is "no evidence" who the hijackers were is just plain delusional.

"The "conspiracy theorists" believe if it was Arabs, they did not act alone. (They got shit loads of help from someone that will not allow a real investigation.)"

Yes, they got shit loads of help from the Bush Administration, before and after. And, we know that the business connectons between the Bushes and bin Ladens go way back. An older brother of Osama was one of Shrub's first benefactors when he was in the oil business in Texas. The Bushes and the Saudi Royals are thick as thieves, and we know the Saudi Royals provided financial support to Al Qaeda. Just recently, the White House made sure the story of Saudi involvement got redacted from the congressional 9/11 report.

"OR, I totally got what Don meant wrong."

Oh, you got what he meant right; I'm telling you that you both are missing the big picture.